Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11376151›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2001

Comprehensive isolation of meiosis-specific genes identifies novel proteins and unusual non-coding transcripts in Schizosaccharomyces pombe.

T Watanabe, K Miyashita, T T Saito, T Yoneki, Y Kakihara, K Nabeshima, Y A Kishi, C Shimoda, H Nojima

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Neural lineage tracing in the mammalian brain.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2018
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

T WatanabeDepartment of Molecular Genetics, Research Institute for Microbial Diseases, Osaka University, 3-1 Yamadaoka, Suita City, Osaka 565-0871, Japan.
K Miyashita
T T Saito
T Yoneki
Y Kakihara
K Nabeshima
Y A Kishi
C Shimoda
H Nojima
Osaka University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In order to isolate meiosis-specific genes in Schizosaccharomyces pombe, we have constructed a subtracted cDNA library enriched in clones whose expression is enhanced during meiosis induced by nitrogen starvation. Using northern blot analysis, we isolated 31 kinds of clones whose expression was induced in a meiosis/sporulation-specific manner. We comprehensively named them meu after meiotic expression upregulated. The transcription of 20 meu genes was found to be dependent on the mei4(+) gene, which encodes a transcription factor required for the progression of meiosis. DNA sequencing indicated that most of the meu genes encode novel proteins. Notably, five of the meu genes harbor no apparent protein coding sequences, and the transcripts form stable hairpin structures, suggesting that they may generate non-coding RNAs or antisense RNAS: The results presented here imply that RNAs are also important for the comprehensive characterization of genomic expression.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, FungalBase SequenceDNA, ComplementaryFungal ProteinsGene LibraryGenes, FungalMeiosisMolecular Sequence DataRNA, FungalSchizosaccharomycesSequence Homology, Nucleic AcidSpores, FungalTranscription, GeneticDNA, ComplementaryFungal ProteinsRNA, Fungal

Identifiers

PMID11376151
PMCPMC55713
OpenAlexW2109635944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.