Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11375232›Full record

Trial reportBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2001

Pragmatic randomised controlled trial to evaluate guidelines for the management of infertility across the primary care-secondary care interface.

J Morrison, L Carroll, S Twaddle, I Cameron, J Grimshaw, A Leyland, H Baillie, G Watt

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical TrialEvaluation StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Referral interventions from primary to specialist care: a systematic review of international evidence.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2014
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. A systematic review of the effect of primary care-based service innovations on quality and patterns of referral to specialist secondary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2003
    Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Open Access Tubal aSsessment for the initial management of infertility in general practice (the OATS trial): a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2009
    Trial
  9. Reassured or fobbed off? Perspectives on infertility consultations in primary care: a qualitative study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2012
    Article
  10. The use of three strategies to improve quality of care at a national level.Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2012
    Article
  11. Management of the infertile couple: an evidence-based protocol.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2010
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Evaluating decision aids--where next?Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2004
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Implementing national guidelines at local level.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2001
    Article
  16. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

J MorrisonDepartment of General Practice, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 0RR, UK.
L Carroll
S Twaddle
I Cameron
J Grimshaw
A Leyland
H Baillie
G Watt
University of Glasgow · GBMother Hospital · INStobhill Hospital · GBUniversity of Aberdeen · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate the effect of clinical guidelines on the management of infertility across the primary care-secondary care interface.

designCluster randomised controlled trial.

settingGeneral practices and NHS hospitals accepting referrals for infertility in the Greater Glasgow Health Board area.

participantsAll 221 general practices in Glasgow; 214 completed the trial.

interventionGeneral practices in the intervention arm received clinical guidelines developed locally. Control practices received them one year later. Dissemination of the guidelines included educational meetings.

main outcome measuresThe time from presentation to referral, investigations completed in general practice, the number and content of visits as a hospital outpatient, the time to reach a management plan, and costs for referrals from the two groups.

resultsData on 689 referrals were collected. No significant difference was found in referral rates for infertility. Fewer than 1% of couples were referred inappropriately early. Referrals from intervention practices were significantly more likely to have all relevant investigations carried out (odds ratio 1.32, 95% confidence interval 1.00 to 1.75, P=0.025). 70% of measurements of serum progesterone concentrations during the midluteal phase and 34% of semen analyses were repeated at least once in hospital, despite having been recorded as normal when checked in general practice. No difference was found in the proportion of referrals in which a management plan was reached within one year or in the mean duration between first appointment and date of management plan. NHS costs were not significantly affected.

conclusionsDissemination of infertility guidelines by commonly used methods results in a modest increase in referrals having recommended investigations completed in general practice, but there are no detectable differences in outcome for patients or reduction in costs. Clinicians in secondary care tended to fail to respond to changes in referral practice by doctors. Guidelines that aim to improve the referral process need to be disseminated and implemented so as to lead to changes in both primary care and secondary care.

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicCost-Benefit AnalysisFamily PracticeFemaleGuideline AdherenceHumansInfertilityInformation ServicesMalePractice Patterns, Physicians'Referral and ConsultationTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID11375232
PMCPMC31924
OpenAlexW1777327216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.