Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11375228›Full record

SynthesisBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2001

Oral mucolytic drugs for exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: systematic review.

P J Poole, P N Black

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
20.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 255 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Chronic Bronchitis: Where Are We Now?Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (Miami, Fla.) · 2019
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Scientific Papers and Patents on Substances with Unproven Effects. Part 2.Recent patents on drug delivery & formulation · 2019
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. N-acetylcysteine in COPD: why, how, and when?Multidisciplinary respiratory medicine · 2015
    Review
  15. Antioxidant pharmacological therapies for COPD.Current opinion in pharmacology · 2012
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Oxidative stress in asthma.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2011
    Article
  20. Mucoactive therapy in COPD.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2010
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

P J PooleDepartment of Medicine, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand.
P N Black
University of Auckland · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the effects of oral mucolytics in adults with stable chronic bronchitis and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

designSystematic review of randomised controlled trials that compared at least two months of regular oral mucolytic drugs with placebo. STUDIES: Twenty three randomised controlled trials in outpatients in Europe and United States.

main outcome measuresExacerbations, days of illness, lung function, adverse events.

resultsCompared with placebo, the number of exacerbations was significantly reduced in subjects taking oral mucolytics (weighted mean difference -0.07 per month, 95% confidence interval -0.08 to -0.05, P<0.0001). Based on the annualised rate of exacerbations in the control subjects of 2.7 a year, this is a 29% reduction. The number needed to treat for one subject to have no exacerbation in the study period would be 6. Days of illness also fell (weighted mean difference -0.56, -0.77 to -0.35, P<0.0001). The number of subjects who had no exacerbations in the study period was greater in the mucolytic group (odds ratio 2.22, 95% confidence interval 1.93 to 2.54, P<0.0001). There was no difference in lung function or in adverse events reported between treatments.

conclusionsIn chronic bronchitis and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, treatment with mucolytics is associated with a reduction in acute exacerbations and days of illness. As these drugs have to be taken long term, they could be most useful in patients who have repeated, prolonged, or severe exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAdministration, OralBronchitisChronic DiseaseExpectorantsHumansLungLung Diseases, ObstructiveRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicExpectorants

Identifiers

PMID11375228
PMCPMC31920
OpenAlexW2013697207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.