Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11372314›Full record

ReviewInstructional course lectures2001

The basic science of periprosthetic osteolysis.

M J Archibeck, J J Jacobs, K A Roebuck, T T Glant

Abstract readReview
PubMed
In one paragraph

Review in Instructional course lectures, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Long-term durability of alumina ceramic heads in THA.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2015
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Nanostructured diamond coatings for orthopaedic applications.Woodhead publishing series in biomaterials · 2013
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Periprosthetic osteolysis: genetics, mechanisms and potential therapeutic interventions.Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie · 2012
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

M J ArchibeckDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
J J Jacobs
K A Roebuck
T T Glant

Funding

Wear Particle Disease and NF-kappa B SignalingR01AR063717 · NIAMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GOODMAN, STUART B · 2012 to 2021
$3.5M
Chemokine Directed Cell Trafficking during Continuous Infusion of Wear ParticlesR01AR055650 · NIAMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GOODMAN, STUART B · 2007 to 2016
$3.3M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite improvements in the techniques, materials, and fixation of total joint replacements, wear and its sequelae continue to be the main factors limiting the longevity and clinical success of arthroplasty. Since Charnley first recognized aseptic loosening in the early 1960s, a tremendous amount of information has been gained on the basic science of osteolysis. Tissue explant, animal, and cell culture studies have allowed development of an appreciation of the complexity of cellular interactions and chemical mediators involved in these processes. Cellular participants have been shown to include the macrophage, osteoblast, fibroblast, and osteoclast. The plethora of chemical mediators that are responsible for the cellular interactions and effects on bone primarily include PGE2, TNF-alpha, IL-1, and IL-6. Recent and ongoing work in the field of signaling pathways will continue to advance our understanding of the mechanisms of periprosthetic bone loss. Although initial animal studies are promising for the development of possible pharmacologic agents for the treatment and prevention of osteolysis, well controlled human trials are required.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, ReplacementProsthesis FailureAdultAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalHumansOsteolysisPolyethylenesPolyethylenes

Identifiers

PMID11372314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.