Bronchodilator responsiveness testing in young children.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Development of a novel tool for engaging children and parents in asthma self-management.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2012
   Article
2. Not all children with under-control asthma are controlled.The open respiratory medicine journal · 2008
   Article
3. Diagnostic accuracy of bronchodilator responsiveness in wheezy children.Thorax · 2005
   Article
4. Airway resistance measured by the interrupter technique: normative data for 2-10 year olds of three ethnicities.Archives of disease in childhood · 2002
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  What do parents of wheezy children understand by "wheeze"?2000

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as