Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11368281›Full record

ReviewDrugs2001

Emerging strategies in infectious diseases: new carbapenem and trinem antibacterial agents.

H S Sader, A C Gales

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Drug discovery from natural sources.The AAPS journal · 2006
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Biapenem.Drugs · 2002
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

H S SaderDivision of Infectious Diseases, Universidade Federal de São Paulo - Escola Paulista de Medicina, São Paulo, Brazil. heliosader@uol.com.br
A C Gales
Universidade Federal de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Beta-lactam antibiotics represent the most commonly prescribed antibacterial agents. New beta-lactams have been introduced continuously as many bacteria have developed resistance to older agents. In the late 1970s, a new class of exceptionally broad spectrum beta-lactams, the carbapenems, was identified. Despite being a very potent compound, the antibacterial activity of the first carbapenem, imipenem, was compromised because of hydrolysis by the renal dehydropeptidase enzyme (DHP-1), and it is now coadministered with a potent competitive inhibitor of the DHP-1 enzyme, cilastin. Molecular modifications in the carbapenem nucleus were able to increase stability to DHP-1 and retain the antibacterial activity. However, some important pathogenic bacteria were found to be resistant to this new class of agents. In addition, other clinically important gram-negative species, such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa, developed resistance mainly by the production of potent beta-lactamases and reduced permeability of the outer membrane. Since the discovery of imipenem/cilastatin, a great number of carbapenems have been developed, and a few of them have been marketed. Stability to hydrolysis by DHP-1 and decrease in toxicity were achieved by meropenem and biapenem. However, only a slight increase in the antibacterial potency and spectrum has been accomplished with either the new marketed or experimental parenteral compounds. In addition, compounds that can be administered orally, such as the carbapenens faropenem, CS-834 and MK-826, and the trinem sanfetrinem, have been developed. However, when compared with the parenterally administered compounds, the oral agents seem to lose some in vitro antibacterial activity, especially against P. aeruginosa.

Indexed as

CarbapenemsAnimalsDrug Resistance, MicrobialHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPseudomonas aeruginosaStructure-Activity RelationshipCarbapenems

Identifiers

PMID11368281
OpenAlexW158164310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.