ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2001
Routine care of people with HIV infection and AIDS: should interested general practitioners take the lead?
Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Attitudes about providing HIV care: voices from publicly funded clinics in California.Family practice · 2014Article
- The prevalence of comorbidities among people living with HIV in Brent: a diverse London Borough.London journal of primary care · 2014Article
- Mortality among HIV-1- and human herpesvirus type 8-affected mother-infant pairs in Zambia.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2008Article
- The effects of enhanced access to antiretroviral therapy: a qualitative study of community perceptions in Kampala city, Uganda.African health sciences · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
People with HIV and AIDS in the developed world are living longer and healthier lives following the introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy. The medical management of stable HIV infection could eventually fit into the more normal pattern of chronic disease management in the United Kingdom (UK). Routine monitoring of many chronic conditions is generally regarded as primary care business in partnership with secondary care. The latter service should be reserved for what it does best: periodic review, in-depth assessment, major changes in medication, management of complex or refractory cases, and inpatient care. We look at some of the issues and the arguments for and against any change from the current position in the UK, where almost all HIV infection is managed medically by specialist clinics in secondary and tertiary care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
11360707PMC1314007What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.