Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11359910›Full record

ArticleMolecular and cellular biology2001

Retinoblastoma tumor suppressor protein signals through inhibition of cyclin-dependent kinase 2 activity to disrupt PCNA function in S phase.

Z Sever-Chroneos, S P Angus, A F Fribourg, H Wan, I Todorov, K E Knudsen, E S Knudsen

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular and cellular biology, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Posttranscriptional Regulation ofCancer research · 2017
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Z Sever-ChroneosDepartment of Cell Biology, Vontz Center for Molecular Studies, University of Cincinnati, College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio 45267-0521, USA.
S P Angus
A F Fribourg
H Wan
I Todorov
K E Knudsen
E S Knudsen
University of Cincinnati Medical Center · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

RB TUMOR SUPPRESSOR--MECHANISMS OF PROLIFERATION CONTROLR01CA082525 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI KNUDSEN, ERIK · 1999 to 2003
$1.2M
RB-mediated replication controlR01CA106471 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI KNUDSEN, ERIK · 2004 to 2008
$1.2M
NCI NIH HHS CA82525NCI NIH HHS R01 CA082525NCI NIH HHS R01 CA106471
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The retinoblastoma tumor suppressor protein (RB) is a negative regulator of the cell cycle that inhibits both G(1) and S-phase progression. While RB-mediated G(1) inhibition has been extensively studied, the mechanism utilized for S-phase inhibition is unknown. To delineate the mechanism through which RB inhibits DNA replication, we generated cells which inducibly express a constitutively active allele of RB (PSM-RB). We show that RB-mediated S-phase inhibition does not inhibit the chromatin binding function of MCM2 or RPA, suggesting that RB does not regulate the prereplication complex or disrupt early initiation events. However, activation of RB in S-phase cells disrupts the chromatin tethering of PCNA, a requisite component of the DNA replication machinery. The action of RB was S phase specific and did not inhibit the DNA damage-mediated association of PCNA with chromatin. We also show that RB-mediated PCNA inhibition was dependent on downregulation of CDK2 activity, which was achieved through the downregulation of cyclin A. Importantly, restoration of cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (CDK2)-cyclin A and thus PCNA activity partially restored S-phase progression in the presence of active RB. Therefore, the data presented identify RB-mediated regulation of PCNA activity via CDK2 attenuation as a mechanism through which RB regulates S-phase progression. Together, these findings identify a novel pathway of RB-mediated replication inhibition.

Indexed as

CDC2-CDC28 KinasesAnimalsBase SequenceCell LineChromatinCyclin ACyclin-Dependent Kinase 2Cyclin-Dependent KinasesDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA PrimersDNA ReplicationProliferating Cell Nuclear AntigenProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesRatsReplication Protein ARetinoblastoma ProteinCDC2-CDC28 KinasesCdk2 protein, ratChromatinCyclin ACyclin-Dependent Kinase 2Cyclin-Dependent KinasesDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA PrimersProliferating Cell Nuclear AntigenProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesReplication Protein ARetinoblastoma Protein

Identifiers

PMID11359910
PMCPMC87065
OpenAlexW2012513460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.