Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11359546›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2001

Views of United States physicians and members of the American Medical Association House of Delegates on physician-assisted suicide.

S N Whitney, B W Brown, H Brody, K H Alcser, J G Bachman, H T Greely

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Competing World Views, Professional Norms, and Conscience.HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Heart out of darkness: learning from end-of-life care.Journal of general internal medicine · 2001
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

S N WhitneyDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77005,USA. swhitney@bcm.tmc.edu
B W Brown
H Brody
K H Alcser
J G Bachman
H T Greely

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo ascertain the views of physicians and physician leaders toward the legalization of physician-assisted suicide.

designConfidential mail questionnaire.

participantsA nationwide random sample of physicians of all ages and specialties, and all members of the American Medical Association (AMA) House of Delegates as of April 1996. MEASUREMENTS: Demographic and practice characteristics and attitude toward legalization of physician-assisted suicide. MAIN

resultsUsable questionnaires were returned by 658 of 930 eligible physicians in the nationwide random sample (71%) and 315 of 390 eligible physicians in the House of Delegates (81%). In the nationwide random sample, 44.5% favored legalization (16.4% definitely and 28.1% probably), 33.9% opposed legalization (20.4% definitely and 13.5% probably), and 22% were unsure. Opposition to legalization was strongly associated with self-defined politically conservative beliefs, religious affiliation, and the importance of religion to the respondent (P <.001). Among members of the AMA House of Delegates, 23.5% favored legalization (7.3% definitely and 16.2% probably), 61.6% opposed legalization (43.5% definitely and 18.1% probably), and 15% were unsure; their views differed significantly from those of the nationwide random sample (P <.001). Given the choice, a majority of both groups would prefer no law at all, with physician-assisted suicide being neither legal nor illegal.

conclusionsMembers of the AMA House of Delegates strongly oppose physician-assisted suicide, but rank-and-file physicians show no consensus either for or against its legalization. Although the debate is sometimes adversarial, most physicians in the United States are uncertain or endorse moderate views on assisted suicide.

Indexed as

American Medical AssociationAttitude of Health PersonnelOrganizational PolicyAdultAnalysis of VarianceEthics, MedicalFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedOdds RatioPhysiciansSuicide, AssistedSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesDeath and EuthanasiaEmpirical Approach

Identifiers

PMID11359546
PMCPMC1495216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.