Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11359545›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2001

Conflict associated with decisions to limit life-sustaining treatment in intensive care units.

C M Breen, A P Abernethy, K H Abbott, J A Tulsky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 106 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
106citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

106 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. The Family Navigator: A Pilot Intervention to Support Intensive Care Unit Family Surrogates.American journal of critical care : an official publication, American Association of Critical-Care Nurses · 2016
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Clinicians' perceptions of the usefulness of a communication facilitator in the intensive care unit.American journal of critical care : an official publication, American Association of Critical-Care Nurses · 2014
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Surrogate Wars: The "Best Interest Values" Hierarchy & End-of-Life Conflicts with Surrogate Decision-Makers.HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues · 2025
    Article
  13. Understanding and addressing a 'difficult' family in ICU.Critical care (London, England) · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Ethical issues encountered by French intensive care unit caregivers during the first COVID-19 outbreak.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

46 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

C M BreenDepartments of Pathology, Duke University, Durham, NC.
A P Abernethy
K H Abbott
J A Tulsky

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the incidence and nature of interpersonal conflicts that arise when patients in the intensive care unit are considered for limitation of life-sustaining treatment.

designQualitative analysis of prospectively gathered interviews.

settingSix intensive care units at a university medical center.

participantsFour hundred six physicians and nurses who were involved in the care of 102 patients for whom withdrawal or withholding of treatment was considered. MEASUREMENTS: Semistructured interviews addressed disagreements during life-sustaining treatment decision making. Two raters coded transcripts of the audiotaped interviews. MAIN

resultsAt least 1 health care provider in 78% of the cases described a situation coded as conflict. Conflict occurred between the staff and family members in 48% of the cases, among staff members in 48%, and among family members in 24%. In 63% of the cases, conflict arose over the decision about life-sustaining treatment itself. In 45% of the cases, conflict occurred over other tasks such as communication and pain control. Social issues caused conflict in 19% of the cases.

conclusionsConflict is more prevalent in the setting of intensive care decision making than has previously been demonstrated. While conflict over the treatment decision itself is most common, conflict over other issues, including social issues, is also significant. By identifying conflict and by recognizing that the treatment decision may not be the only conflict present, or even the main one, clinicians may address conflict more constructively.

Indexed as

Conflict, PsychologicalDecision MakingAgedEuthanasia, PassiveFamily RelationsFemaleHealth SurveysHumansInterprofessional RelationsLife Support CareMaleMiddle AgedProfessional-Family RelationsQuality of Health CareResuscitation OrdersDeath and EuthanasiaEmpirical Approach

Identifiers

PMID11359545
PMCPMC1495214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.