Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11356960›Full record

ArticleJournal of virology2001

The ability of an oligomeric human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) envelope antigen to elicit neutralizing antibodies against primary HIV-1 isolates is improved following partial deletion of the second hypervariable region.

S W Barnett, S Lu, I Srivastava, S Cherpelis, A Gettie, J Blanchard, S Wang, I Mboudjeka, L Leung, Y Lian and 8 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virology, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 96 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
96citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

96 citing papers in PubMed, 218 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Neutralizing antibodies to HIV-1 induced by immunization.The Journal of experimental medicine · 2013
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

36 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

S W BarnettChiron Corporation, Emeryville, California 94608-2916, USA.
S Lu
I Srivastava
S Cherpelis
A Gettie
J Blanchard
S Wang
I Mboudjeka
L Leung
Y Lian
A Fong
C Buckner
A Ly
S Hilt
J Ulmer
C T Wild
J R Mascola
L Stamatatos
Aaron Diamond AIDS Research Center · USUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · USTulane University · USSensei Biotherapeutics (United States) · USWalter Reed Army Institute of Research · US

Funding

VACCINE EFFICACY OF MODIFIED HIV ENVELOPESR01AI047708 · NIAID · SEATTLE BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI STAMATATOS, LEONIDAS · 2000 to 2010
$5.0M
Vaccine Efficacy of Modified HIV EnvelopesR56AI047708 · NIAID · SEATTLE BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI STAMATATOS, LEONIDAS · 2012 to 2012
$540k
ANTIGENICITY OF HIV1 MODIFIED ENVELOPESR21AI044309 · NIAID · AARON DIAMOND AIDS RESEARCH CENTER · PI STAMATATOS, LEONIDAS A · 1999 to 2000
$209k
IMMUNOGENICITY OF HIV DNA VACCINER29AI040337 · NIAID · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI LU, SHAN · 1997 to 2001
$166k
NIAID NIH HHS AI40337NIAID NIH HHS AI44309NIAID NIH HHS AI44309-01NIAID NIH HHS AI47708-01NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI047708NIAID NIH HHS R56 AI047708
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Partial deletion of the second hypervariable region from the envelope of the primary-like SF162 virus increases the exposure of certain neutralization epitopes and renders the virus, SF162DeltaV2, highly susceptible to neutralization by clade B and non-clade B human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-positive) sera (L. Stamatatos and C. Cheng-Mayer, J. Virol. 78:7840-7845, 1998). This observation led us to propose that the modified, SF162DeltaV2-derived envelope may elicit higher titers of cross-reactive neutralizing antibodies than the unmodified SF162-derived envelope. To test this hypothesis, we immunized rabbits and rhesus macaques with the gp140 form of these two envelopes. In rabbits, both immunogens elicited similar titers of binding antibodies but the modified immunogen was more effective in eliciting neutralizing antibodies, not only against the SF162DeltaV2 and SF162 viruses but also against several heterologous primary HIV type 1 (HIV-1) isolates. In rhesus macaques both immunogens elicited potent binding antibodies, but again the modified immunogen was more effective in eliciting the generation of neutralizing antibodies against the SF162DeltaV2 and SF162 viruses. Antibodies capable of neutralizing several, but not all, heterologous primary HIV-1 isolates tested were elicited only in macaques immunized with the modified immunogen. The efficiency of neutralization of these heterologous isolates was lower than that recorded against the SF162 isolate. Our results strongly suggest that although soluble oligomeric envelope subunit vaccines may elicit neutralizing antibody responses against heterologous primary HIV-1 isolates, these responses will not be broad and potent unless specific modifications are introduced to increase the exposure of conserved neutralization epitopes.

Indexed as

AIDS VaccinesGene DeletionAnimalsAntibodies, ViralAntigens, ViralComplementarity Determining RegionsCross ReactionsGene Products, envHIV-1HIV Envelope Protein gp120HIV InfectionsHumansImmunizationImmunization, SecondaryMacaca mulattaNeutralization TestsAIDS VaccinesAntibodies, ViralAntigens, ViralComplementarity Determining RegionsGene Products, envHIV Envelope Protein gp120HIV envelope protein gp120 (305-321)Peptide FragmentsVaccines, DNA

Identifiers

PMID11356960
PMCPMC114265
OpenAlexW2085662163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.