Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11355939›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2001

Volumes of cancer surgery for breast, colorectal and ovarian cancer 1992-97: Is there evidence of increasing sub-specialization by surgeons?

K Jolly, J Parry, A Rouse, A Stevens

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

K JollyDepartment of Public Health and Epidemiology, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
J Parry
A Rouse
A Stevens
University of Birmingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 'Calman-Hine Report' (1995) recommended that cancer surgery should be limited to 'high-volume' consultants. Through an analysis of 5 years of Hospital Episode Statistics for the West Midlands region (1992-1997), we have investigated whether there is evidence of increasing numbers of patients with breast, colorectal or ovarian cancer being treated by high throughput, i.e. sub-specialist surgeons, who carry out more than a threshold level of primary cancer resections annually. The proportion of cases treated by the high-volume breast, colorectal and ovarian cancer surgeons increased annually during the 5 years. The absolute number of consultant firms who undertook breast cancer resections reduced during the 5 years; but the number doing colorectal and ovarian surgery increased. Throughout the 5 years, half of the ovarian cancer resections were carried out by consultant firms who did very few procedures - less than 5 of these procedures annually. The relatively high case-load, the elective nature of breast cancer surgery and an early policy change have undoubtedly facilitated the move towards sub-specialization. The weaker trends for colorectal and ovarian cancer surgery suggest continued monitoring is required to ensure that there is a reduction in the proportion of people treated by surgeons who undertake few cancer resections annually.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsColorectal NeoplasmsConsultantsFemaleHumansOvarian NeoplasmsSurgical Procedures, OperativeTime FactorsUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID11355939
PMCPMC2363641
OpenAlexW2089547222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.