ArticleBritish journal of cancer2001
Volumes of cancer surgery for breast, colorectal and ovarian cancer 1992-97: Is there evidence of increasing sub-specialization by surgeons?
Article in British journal of cancer, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of ICU bed availability on ovarian cancer surgical hospitalization rates during the first wave of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2022Article
- The Relevance of Gynecologic Oncologists to Provide High-Quality of Care to Women with Gynecological Cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2015Review
- Comparison of administrative data with the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI) colorectal cancer database.International journal of colorectal disease · 2008Article
- The impact of the Calman-Hine report on the processes and outcomes of care for Yorkshire's colorectal cancer patients.British journal of cancer · 2006Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The 'Calman-Hine Report' (1995) recommended that cancer surgery should be limited to 'high-volume' consultants. Through an analysis of 5 years of Hospital Episode Statistics for the West Midlands region (1992-1997), we have investigated whether there is evidence of increasing numbers of patients with breast, colorectal or ovarian cancer being treated by high throughput, i.e. sub-specialist surgeons, who carry out more than a threshold level of primary cancer resections annually. The proportion of cases treated by the high-volume breast, colorectal and ovarian cancer surgeons increased annually during the 5 years. The absolute number of consultant firms who undertook breast cancer resections reduced during the 5 years; but the number doing colorectal and ovarian surgery increased. Throughout the 5 years, half of the ovarian cancer resections were carried out by consultant firms who did very few procedures - less than 5 of these procedures annually. The relatively high case-load, the elective nature of breast cancer surgery and an early policy change have undoubtedly facilitated the move towards sub-specialization. The weaker trends for colorectal and ovarian cancer surgery suggest continued monitoring is required to ensure that there is a reduction in the proportion of people treated by surgeons who undertake few cancer resections annually.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.