ReviewCurrent rheumatology reports2001
Ultrasound of the skeleton: review of its clinical applications and pitfalls.
Review in Current rheumatology reports, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical utilities of quantitative ultrasound in osteoporosis associated with inflammatory rheumatic diseases.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2018Review
- Osteoporosis and osteopathy markers in patients with mastocytosis.Turkish journal of haematology : official journal of Turkish Society of Haematology · 2015Article
- Saturated and monounsaturated fatty acid status is associated with bone strength estimated by calcaneal ultrasonography in Inuit women from Nunavik (Canada): a cross-sectional study.The journal of nutrition, health & aging · 2014Article
- Dioxin-like compounds and bone quality in Cree women of Eastern James Bay (Canada): a cross-sectional study.Environmental health : a global access science source · 2013Article
- Dioxin-like compounds are not associated with bone strength measured by ultrasonography in Inuit women from Nunavik (Canada): results of a cross-sectional study.International journal of circumpolar health · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) is receiving considerable attention in the assessment of osteoporosis because of its ease of use, lack of radiation exposure, region of interest, and relatively low costs. These features have made the technique appealing for screening adult and pediatric patients. This article discusses some of the clinical applications, limitations, and strengths of QUS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.