Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11352436›Full record

Trial reportClinical pharmacokinetics2001

Pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability of moxifloxacin, a novel 8-methoxyfluoroquinolone, after repeated oral administration.

H Stass, D Kubitza, U Schühly

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02563327 (TBTC Study 31 PK/PD), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02563327 phase3completednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

TBTC Study 31 PK/PD: Population Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Study of Efficacy and Safety of High-Dose Rifapentine and Moxifloxacin for Treatment of Tuberculosis in the Study 31 Treatment Trial: Intensive PK Sampling

TypeinterventionalSponsorCenters for Disease Control and PreventionRan2016 to 2021Enrolled2,516ConditionsTuberculosisArmsRifapentine, Moxifloxacin, Rifampin, Isoniazid, Pyrazinamide
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Efficacy of antibiotic treatment of implant-associatedDrug design, development and therapy · 2017
    Article
  11. The role of moxifloxacin in tuberculosis therapy.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2016
    Review
  12. Gender analysis of moxifloxacin clinical trials.Journal of women's health (2002) · 2014
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Moxifloxacin in the management of exacerbations of chronic bronchitis and COPD.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2007
    Review
  18. Moxifloxacin in the treatment of skin and skin structure infections.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2006
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

H StassPharma Research Centre, Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Bayer AG, Wuppertal, Germany. Heino.Stass.hs@bayer-ag.de
D Kubitza
U Schühly
Bayer (Germany) · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate the pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability of moxifloxacin after single and repeated doses. DESIGN AND

settingThis series comprised 3 separate placebo-controlled studies, 2 studies with a randomised crossover design (up to 400 mg/day) and 1 study with a group comparison design (600mg once daily). PATIENTS AND

participantsHealthy male volunteers were included in these studies.

methodsParticipants received 5-day treatment courses of moxifloxacin 100mg (n = 8) or 200mg (n = 8) twice daily or 400mg once daily (n = 7), or a 10-day treatment course of moxifloxacin 600mg once daily (n = 7). Pharmacokinetics were characterised after the first dose (24-hour profile) and the last dose (96-hour profile), with additional trough and peak measurements during the courses.

resultsAll treatments were well tolerated. No clinically relevant changes in the standard laboratory tests, vital signs or ECG were observed. Minimum plasma concentrations required to inhibit 90% of susceptible micro-organisms (e.g. 0.125 mg/L for Streptococcus pneumoniae) were attained rapidly and exceeded until the end of treatment. Repeated doses of 100 and 200mg twice daily and 400mg once daily resulted in stable trough and peak concentrations within 3 days of the first dose. The concentrations at steady state were moderately higher (approximately 30% for 400mg once daily) than after the first dose. Steady-state peak concentrations were between 0.9 mg/L (100mg twice daily) and 5.7 mg/L (600mg once daily). The terminal elimination half-life was 14 to 15 hours, supporting once daily administration of the drug. Accumulation ratios ranged between 87% for the lowest dosage and 111% after repeated doses of 600mg once daily, indicating the absence of clinically relevant accumulation due to non-linear pharmacokinetics. Across the studies, the average exposure after single and repeated doses was proportional to the dose administered.

conclusionsThese studies indicate that, based on the safety profile and the pharmacokinetic behaviour of moxifloxacin, a dosage regimen of 400mg given once daily should be effective and well tolerated for the treatment of various infections.

Indexed as

Aza CompoundsFluoroquinolonesQuinolinesAdministration, OralAdultAnti-Infective AgentsArea Under CurveBiological AvailabilityChromatography, High Pressure LiquidCross-Over StudiesDrug Administration ScheduleHalf-LifeHumansMaleMoxifloxacinAnti-Infective AgentsAza CompoundsFluoroquinolonesMoxifloxacinQuinolines

Identifiers

PMID11352436
OpenAlexW2016090617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.