Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11350942›Full record

ArticleThe EMBO journal2001

Positive feedback in eukaryotic gene networks: cell differentiation by graded to binary response conversion.

A Becskei, B Séraphin, L Serrano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The EMBO journal, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 268 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
268citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

268 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Bacteria as living biosensors for DNA.Nature reviews bioengineering · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Cusp bifurcation in a metastatic regulatory network.Journal of theoretical biology · 2023
    Article
  20. Article

208 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

A BecskeiEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, Meyerhofstrasse 1, D-69012 Heidelberg, Germany. becskei@embl-heidelberg.de
B Séraphin
L Serrano

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Feedback is a ubiquitous control mechanism of gene networks. Here, we have used positive feedback to construct a synthetic eukaryotic gene switch in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Within this system, a continuous gradient of constitutively expressed transcriptional activator is translated into a cell phenotype switch when the activator is expressed autocatalytically. This finding is consistent with a mathematical model whose analysis shows that continuous input parameters are converted into a bimodal probability distribution by positive feedback, and that this resembles analog-digital conversion. The autocatalytic switch is a robust property in eukaryotic gene expression. Although the behavior of individual cells within a population is random, the proportion of the cell population displaying either low or high expression states can be regulated. These results have implications for understanding the graded and probabilistic mechanisms of enhancer action and cell differentiation.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, FungalSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsCell DifferentiationDNA-Binding ProteinsEukaryotic CellsFeedbackFungal ProteinsGenes, ReporterGreen Fluorescent ProteinsLuminescent ProteinsPromoter Regions, GeneticRecombinant Fusion ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeTetracyclineTrans-ActivatorsTranscriptional ActivationDNA-Binding ProteinsFungal ProteinsGAL4 protein, S cerevisiaeGreen Fluorescent ProteinsLuminescent ProteinsRecombinant Fusion ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsTetracyclineTrans-ActivatorsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID11350942
PMCPMC125456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.