ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2001
Appraising organised screening programmes for testing for genetic susceptibility to cancer.
Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- How is genetic testing evaluated? A systematic review of the literature.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2018Pooled it
- Next-generation sequencing in newborn screening: Current status, challenges, and future perspectives.Pediatric investigation · 2026Review
- Wilson and Jungner Revisited: Are Screening Criteria Fit for the 21st Century?International journal of neonatal screening · 2024Review
- Neonatal and carrier screening for rare diseases: how innovation challenges screening criteria worldwide.Journal of community genetics · 2021Article
- Autonomy Challenges in Epigenetic Risk-Stratified Cancer Screening: How Can Patient Decision Aids Support Informed Consent?Journal of personalized medicine · 2019Review
- Population screening for BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations: lessons from qualitative analysis of the screening experience.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2017Article
- The future role of genetic screening to detect newborns at risk of childhood-onset hearing loss.International journal of audiology · 2013Review
- Genetic testing and common disorders in a public health framework: how to assess relevance and possibilities. Background Document to the ESHG recommendations on genetic testing and common disorders.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2011Review
- Revisiting Wilson and Jungner in the genomic age: a review of screening criteria over the past 40 years.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2008Article
- ECG screening of newborns to avoid sudden infant death syndrome?Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2006Article
- How can the evaluation of genetic tests be enhanced? Lessons learned from the ACCE framework and evaluating genetic tests in the United Kingdom.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2005Article
- Costs of prophylactic resection.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2003Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.