Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11348426›Full record

ArticleCell proliferation2001

Pattern of self-organization in tumour systems: complex growth dynamics in a novel brain tumour spheroid model.

T S Deisboeck, M E Berens, A R Kansal, S Torquato, A O Stemmer-Rachamimov, E A Chiocca

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell proliferation, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Spheroid Invasion Assay of Melanoma Cells by Hanging Drop Technique.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2027
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. 3D Tumor Spheroid Models for In Vitro Therapeutic Screening of Nanoparticles.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

T S DeisboeckNeurosurgical Service, MGH-Brain Tumor Center, Molecular Neuro-Oncology Laboratory, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital East, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA. deisboec@helix.mgh.harvard.edu
M E Berens
A R Kansal
S Torquato
A O Stemmer-Rachamimov
E A Chiocca

Funding

The role of microvesicles in giloma virotherapyP01CA069246 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI CHAREST, ALAIN · 1996 to 2021
$30.9M
INTERDISCIPLINARY DEVELOPMENT OF A COMPUTATIONAL TUMOR MR21CA084509 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI CHIOCCA, E. ANTONIO · 1999 to 2000
$84k
NCI NIH HHS CA69246NCI NIH HHS CA84509
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We propose that a highly malignant brain tumour is an opportunistic, self-organizing and adaptive complex dynamic biosystem rather than an unorganized cell mass. To test the hypothesis of related key behaviour such as cell proliferation and invasion, we have developed a new in vitro assay capable of displaying several of the dynamic features of this multiparameter system in the same experimental setting. This assay investigates the development of multicellular U87MGmEGFR spheroids in a specific extracellular matrix gel over time. The results show that key features such as volumetric growth and cell invasion can be analysed in the same setting over 144 h without continuously supplementing additional nutrition. Moreover, tumour proliferation and invasion are closely correlated and both key features establish a distinct ratio over time to achieve maximum cell velocity and to maintain the system's temporo-spatial expansion dynamics. Single cell invasion follows a chain-like pattern leading to the new concept of a intrabranch homotype attraction. Since preliminary studies demonstrate that heterotype attraction can specifically direct and accelerate the emerging invasive network, we further introduce the concept of least resistance, most permission and highest attraction as an essential principle for tumour invasion. Together, these results support the hypothesis of a self-organizing adaptive biosystem.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAdaptation, BiologicalBrain NeoplasmsCell DivisionGliomaModels, StructuralNeoplasm InvasivenessSpheroids, Cellular

Identifiers

PMID11348426
PMCPMC6495396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.