Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11347269›Full record

ArticleFolia microbiologica2000

Genetic variability within the Aspergillus viridinutans species.

J Varga, B Tóth, K Rigó, F Debets, Z Kozakiewicz

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Folia microbiologica, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

J VargaDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Szeged, 6701 Szeged, Hungary. jvarga@bio.u-szeged.hu
B Tóth
K Rigó
F Debets
Z Kozakiewicz
University of Szeged · HUCAB International · GBWageningen University & Research · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The intraspecific variability of the Aspergillus viridinutans species was examined using various techniques including morphological examinations, carbon-source-utilization tests, restriction-enzyme analysis of the mitochondrial and nuclear DNA, and sequence analysis of part of the beta-tubulin gene. Although the genetic distances between the isolates were higher than between, e.g., A. fumigatus and Neosartorya fischeri, most A. viridinutans isolates, together with N. aureola and N. udagawae strains, were found to belong to a single cluster based on sequence data. Strain FRR 1266, which was earlier classified as a highly divergent A. fumigatus isolate, was found to belong to the A. viridinutans species. The ochratoxin A producing A. viridinutans strain IMI 306135 was most closely related to an asexual isolate. These two latter strains were more closely related to A. fumigatus and N. fischeri than to any A. viridinutans strains, and possibly represent a new species in the Aspergillus section Fumigati. The dendrogram based on carbon source utilization data and results of restriction analysis of the mitochondrial and nuclear DNA of the strains supported most of the evolutionary relationships observed on the basis of sequence data. The results indicate that the presence or absence of nodding conidial heads is not an unequivocal morphological character for the identification of species within the Aspergillus section Fumigati.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationAnimalsAspergillusCarbonCulture MediaDNA, FungalMolecular Sequence DataMycological Typing TechniquesPhylogenyPolymorphism, Restriction Fragment LengthRabbitsSequence Analysis, DNATubulinCarbonCulture MediaDNA, FungalTubulin

Identifiers

PMID11347269
OpenAlexW2066205726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.