Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11346456›Full record

ArticleBMC medical ethics2001

Clinical ethics revisited.

Peter A Singer, Edmund D Pellegrino, Mark Siegler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical ethics, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Making the (Business) Case for Clinical Ethics Support in the UK.HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Principles of Clinical Ethics and Their Application to Practice.Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Do organizational and clinical ethics in a hospital setting need different venues?HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues · 2014
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Institutional challenges for clinical ethics committees.HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues · 2011
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Hiring a hospital staff clinical ethicist: creating a formalized behavioral interview model.HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues · 2010
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Peter A SingerSun Life Chair and Director, University of Toronto Joint Centre for Bioethics Professor of Medicine, University of Toronto. peter.singer@utoronto.ca
Edmund D Pellegrino
Mark Siegler

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A decade ago, we reviewed the field of clinical ethics; assessed its progress in research, education, and ethics committees and consultation; and made predictions about the future of the field. In this article, we revisit clinical ethics to examine our earlier observations, highlight key developments, and discuss remaining challenges for clinical ethics, including the need to develop a global perspective on clinical ethics problems.

Indexed as

Ethics, ClinicalBioethicsCurriculumEducation, Medical, ContinuingEmpirical ResearchEthics Committees, ClinicalEthics ConsultationEthics, InstitutionalInterdisciplinary CommunicationPublishingTeachingAnalytical ApproachBioethics and Professional Ethics

Identifiers

PMID11346456
PMCPMC32193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.