Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11344158›Full record

ArticleJournal of bacteriology2001

Evidence against an Interaction between the mRNA downstream box and 16S rRNA in translation initiation.

I Moll, M Huber, S Grill, P Sairafi, F Mueller, R Brimacombe, P Londei, U Bläsi

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bacteriology, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Dynamic evolution of translation initiation mechanisms in prokaryotes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2010
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Initiation of protein synthesis in bacteria.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2005
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

I MollInstitute of Microbiology and Genetics, University of Vienna, Vienna Biocenter, Dr. Bohrgasse 9, 1030 Vienna, Austria.
M Huber
S Grill
P Sairafi
F Mueller
R Brimacombe
P Londei
U Bläsi
University of Vienna · ATMax Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics · DEVienna Biocenter · ATSapienza University of Rome · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Based on the complementarity of the initial coding region (downstream box [db]) of several bacterial and phage mRNAs to bases 1469 to 1483 in helix 44 of 16S rRNA (anti-downstream box [adb]), it has been proposed that db-adb base pairing enhances translation in a way that is similar to that of the Shine-Dalgarno (SD)/anti-Shine-Dalgarno (aSD) interaction. Computer modeling of helix 44 on the 30S subunit shows that the topography of the 30S ribosome does not allow a simultaneous db-adb interaction and placement of the initiation codon in the ribosomal P site. Thus, the db-adb interaction cannot substitute for the SD-aSD interaction in translation initiation. We have always argued that any contribution of the db-adb interaction should be most apparent on mRNAs devoid of an SD sequence. Here, we show that 30S ribosomes do not bind to leaderless mRNA in the absence of initiator tRNA, even when the initial coding region shows a 15-nucleotide complementarity (optimal fit) with the putative adb. In addition, an optimized db did not affect the translational efficiency of a leaderless lambda cI-lacZ reporter construct. Thus, the db-adb interaction can hardly serve as an initial recruitment signal for ribosomes. Moreover, we show that different leaderless mRNAs are translated in heterologous systems although the sequence of the putative adb's within helix 44 of the 30S subunits of the corresponding bacteria differ largely. Taken our data together with those of others (M. O'Connor, T. Asai, C. L. Squires, and A. E. Dahlberg, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:8973-8978, 1999; A. La Teana, A. Brandi, M. O'Connor, S. Freddi, and C. L. Pon, RNA 6:1393-1402, 2000), we conclude that the db does not base pair with the adb.

Indexed as

Protein BiosynthesisBase PairingBase SequenceEscherichia coliModels, MolecularMolecular Sequence DataNucleic Acid ConformationRNA, MessengerRNA, Ribosomal, 16SThermus thermophilusRNA, MessengerRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID11344158
PMCPMC99648
OpenAlexW2118547644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.