Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11341667›Full record

ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2001

Protective effect of ammonia against reflux esophagitis in rats.

H Hamada, K Haruma, M Mihara, T Kamada, K Sumii, G Kajiyama

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

H HamadaFirst Department of Internal Medicine, Hiroshima University School of Medicine, Japan.
K Haruma
M Mihara
T Kamada
K Sumii
G Kajiyama
Hiroshima University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although several recent studies have reported that curing Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) may result in the development of reflux esophagitis (RE), the mechanisms leading to this complication are unknown. One by product of H. pylori infection is ammonia, which serves as an acid neutralizer. The aim of this study was to clarify whether ammonia, which is produced during H. pylori infection, has a protective effect on the esophagus. Eight-week-old male Sprague-Dawley rats were fasted for 24 hrs. Under anesthesia, both the pylorus and limiting ridge were simultaneously ligated. One hour postligation, 0.3 ml of saline or ammonia at various concentrations was administered intragastrically by gastric intubation. Three hours after ligation, the animals were killed, the esophagus and stomach were removed, and the length of esophageal hemorrhagic erosions was measured. The incidence of RE was 100% (7/7) in the control group, 71% (5/7) in the low-ammonia group, 29% (2/7) in the middle-ammonia group, and 14% (1/7) in the high-ammonia group. The severity of lesions decreased in correspondence to increases in ammonia concentration. The development of RE was significantly inhibited by ammonia in a dose-dependent manner. This study indicates that ammonia protects against development of RE. A decreased amount of ammonia in the stomach might be related to the development of RE after H. pylori eradication therapy.

Indexed as

AmmoniaAnimalsEsophagitis, PepticHelicobacter InfectionsHelicobacter pyloriMaleRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyAmmonia

Identifiers

PMID11341667
OpenAlexW93031944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.