Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11341417›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume2001

Specificity of the Oxford knee status questionnaire. The effect of disease of the hip or lumbar spine on patients' perception of knee disability.

W G Harcourt, S H White, P Jones

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Mid-term clinical results of the cementless R3 cup and Polarstem total hip arthroplasty.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2019
    Article
  5. Article
  6. High correlation of the Oxford Knee Score with postoperative pain, but not with performance-based functioning.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2016
    Article
  7. Can pain and function be distinguished in the Oxford Knee Score in a meaningful way? An exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2013
    Article
  8. Article
  9. The Oxford hip score: the patient's perspective.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2005
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

W G HarcourtRobert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital, Oswestry, Shropshire, UK.
S H White
P Jones
Marymount University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a need for the accurate measurement of the outcome after knee surgery. The Oxford Knee Score is being increasingly used since it is reported to be short, simple, inexpensive and validated. We sent the questionnaire to 346 patients awaiting surgery to the hip or lumbar spine. Only 11% of 141 patients with proximal pathology who denied knee problems gave a maximum score. Their mean score was substantially lower than expected at 28.7 (maximum 48), and was significantly lower than the score of 36.5 obtained from patients after total knee replacement. We therefore suggest that the frequent coexistence of hip or spinal pathology will significantly alter both the absolute score and any improvement to be expected after knee surgery. Although sensitive to disability originating from the knee the Oxford Knee Score is not sufficiently specific since it is heavily influenced by more proximal pathology.

Indexed as

Surveys and QuestionnairesHipHumansJoint DiseasesKneeLumbar Vertebrae

Identifiers

PMID11341417
OpenAlexW2793113521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.