Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11339354›Full record

ReviewImmunologic research2000

T cell immunity in neonates.

A M Garcia, S A Fadel, S Cao, M Sarzotti

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Immunologic research, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 87 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
87citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

87 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Biomarkers of immune dysregulation and posttreatment inflammation in spinal muscular atrophy.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Human Susceptibility to Influenza Infection and Severe Disease.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2021
    Review
  13. Lymphopenia, Lymphopenia-Induced Proliferation, and Autoimmunity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Neonatal gut microbiome and immunity.Current opinion in microbiology · 2020
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

27 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

A M GarciaDepartment of Immunology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
S A Fadel
S Cao
M Sarzotti

Funding

MEMORY T CELL INDUCTION IN NEONATES BY VIRAL VACCINESR29CA065388 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI SARZOTTI-KELSOE, MARCELLA · 1996 to 2000
$144k
NCI NIH HHS CA65388
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Typically, neonates exhibit decreased or aberrant cellular immune responses when compared to adults, resulting in increased susceptibility to infection. However, it is clear that newborns are able to generate adult-like protective T cell responses under certain conditions. The focus of our research is to understand the deficiencies within the neonatal immune system that lead to improper cellular responses and how priming conditions can be altered to elicit the appropriate T cell response necessary to protect against development of pathogen-induced disease. With these goals in mind, we are exploring the attributes of neonatal T cells and their development, as well as the conditions during priming that influence the resulting response to immune challenge during the neonatal period.

Indexed as

Age FactorsAnimalsAnimals, NewbornCell DifferentiationHumansImmunity, CellularInfant, NewbornT-Lymphocytes

Identifiers

PMID11339354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.