Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11339352›Full record

ReviewImmunologic research2000

Tolerance induction for solid organ grafts with donor-derived hematopoietic reconstitution.

K L Gandy

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Immunologic research, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

K L GandyDepartment of Experimental Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA. Gandy001@mc.duke.edu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tolerance of transplanted tissue has been a focus of immunologists for decades. Indeed, to some the birth of immunology and the search for tolerance of the non-self are synonymous. One of the most powerful and reproducible methods of tolerance induction to allogeneic tissue has involved infusion of donor-specific hematopoietic cells. Under certain conditions, such infusion can result in hematopoietic reconstitution that can be experimentally accomplished at a variety of different time-points in the life of an organism from the in utero period through adulthood, reconstitution at each time-point involving consideration of a different set of immunological and physiological parameters. When high levels of donor-derived hematopoietic reconstitution are achieved, tolerance induction to donor-specific antigens is reproducible and long-lasting. Unfortunately, however, clinical efforts to achieve such high levels of hematopoietic reconstitution have historically been unsuccessful or fraught with complications. Transplantation efforts have been plagued by failure of engraftment, graft-vs-host disease (GVHD), or severe immunoincompetence of the recipient. Laboratory and clinical efforts during the last decade have resulted in a variety of developments that may overcome these barriers: (1) methods have been devised in which cells that cause GVHD can be depleted from the hematopoietic graft while hematopoietic reconstitution potential is preserved, (2) methods of harvesting large numbers of cells with multilineage reconstitution potential have been devised (an accomplishment that seems to allow the immunological barrier to be overwhelmed), and (3) capitalizing on the above two principles, minimally toxic preconditioning regimens have been designed that allow allogeneic engraftment. This review will focus on some of the experimental and clinical data of the past and the experimental and clinical issues that loom ahead.

Indexed as

Organ TransplantationAnimalsBlood DonorsGraft vs Host DiseaseHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHost vs Graft ReactionHumansImmunocompromised HostSensitivity and SpecificityTransplantation, HomologousTransplantation Tolerance

Identifiers

PMID11339352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.