Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11337474›Full record

ArticleGenome research2001

Euteleost fish genomes are characterized by expansion of gene families.

M Robinson-Rechavi, O Marchand, H Escriva, P L Bardet, D Zelus, S Hughes, V Laudet

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 214 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Genome-Wide Analysis of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M Robinson-RechaviCentre National pour la Recherche Scientifique UMR 5665, Laboratoire de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, 46 Alleé d'Italie 69364 LYON Cedex 07, France. marc.robinson@ens-lyon.fr
O Marchand
H Escriva
P L Bardet
D Zelus
S Hughes
V Laudet
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRÉcole Normale Supérieure de Lyon · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The presence of additional hox clusters in the zebrafish has led to the hypothesis that there was a whole genome duplication at the origin of modern fish. To investigate the generality of this assumption, we analyzed all available actinopterygian fish gene families, and sequenced nuclear receptors from diverse teleost fish. The origin and timing of duplications was systematically determined by phylogenetic analysis. More genes are indeed found in zebrafish than in mouse. This abundance is shared by all major groups of euteleost fish, but not by eels. Phylogenetic analysis shows that it may result from frequent independent duplications, rather than from an ancestral genome duplication. We predict two zebrafish paralogs for most mouse or human genes, thus expressing a note of caution in functional comparison of fish and mammalian genomes. Redundancy appears to be the rule in fish developmental genetics. Finally, our results imply that the outcome of genome projects cannot be extrapolated easily between fish species.

Indexed as

GenomeAnimalsEelsFishesFlatfishesGene DuplicationGenes, DuplicateHumansMiceMolecular Sequence DataMultigene FamilyPerciformesPhylogenyReceptors, Cytoplasmic and NuclearSalmoniformesSpecies SpecificityReceptors, Cytoplasmic and Nuclear

Identifiers

PMID11337474
PMCPMC311060
OpenAlexW2049642777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.