ArticleGenome research2001
From first base: the sequence of the tip of the X chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster, a comparison of two sequencing strategies.
Article in Genome research, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Short and long-term evolutionary dynamics of subtelomeric piRNA clusters in Drosophila.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2017Article
- The achaete-scute complex in Diptera: patterns of noncoding sequence evolution.Journal of evolutionary biology · 2015Article
- Fruit flies in biomedical research.Genetics · 2015Article
- A drosophila genetic resource of mutants to study mechanisms underlying human genetic diseases.Cell · 2014Article
- A molecularly defined duplication set for the X chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster.Genetics · 2010Article
- Article
- BAC clones generated from sheared DNA.Genomics · 2007Article
- Heat-shock promoters: targets for evolution by P transposable elements in Drosophila.PLoS genetics · 2006Article
- Recurrent insertion and duplication generate networks of transposable element sequences in the Drosophila melanogaster genome.Genome biology · 2006Article
- Assessing the Drosophila melanogaster and Anopheles gambiae genome annotations using genome-wide sequence comparisons.Genome research · 2003Article
- AVID: A global alignment program.Genome research · 2003Article
- Evolutionary conservation of otd/Otx2 transcription factor action: a genome-wide microarray analysis in Drosophila.Genome biology · 2002Article
- A comparative genomic analysis of two distant diptera, the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, and the malaria mosquito, Anopheles gambiae.Genome research · 2002Article
- Mapping and identification of essential gene functions on the X chromosome of Drosophila.EMBO reports · 2002Article
- The transposable elements of the Drosophila melanogaster euchromatin: a genomics perspective.Genome biology · 2002Article
- Finishing a whole-genome shotgun: release 3 of the Drosophila melanogaster euchromatic genome sequence.Genome biology · 2002Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
47 authors at 2 institutions in 6 countries.
Funding
Abstract
We present the sequence of a contiguous 2.63 Mb of DNA extending from the tip of the X chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster. Within this sequence, we predict 277 protein coding genes, of which 94 had been sequenced already in the course of studying the biology of their gene products, and examples of 12 different transposable elements. We show that an interval between bands 3A2 and 3C2, believed in the 1970s to show a correlation between the number of bands on the polytene chromosomes and the 20 genes identified by conventional genetics, is predicted to contain 45 genes from its DNA sequence. We have determined the insertion sites of P-elements from 111 mutant lines, about half of which are in a position likely to affect the expression of novel predicted genes, thus representing a resource for subsequent functional genomic analysis. We compare the European Drosophila Genome Project sequence with the corresponding part of the independently assembled and annotated Joint Sequence determined through "shotgun" sequencing. Discounting differences in the distribution of known transposable elements between the strains sequenced in the two projects, we detected three major sequence differences, two of which are probably explained by errors in assembly; the origin of the third major difference is unclear. In addition there are eight sequence gaps within the Joint Sequence. At least six of these eight gaps are likely to be sites of transposable elements; the other two are complex. Of the 275 genes in common to both projects, 60% are identical within 1% of their predicted amino-acid sequence and 31% show minor differences such as in choice of translation initiation or termination codons; the remaining 9% show major differences in interpretation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.