ArticleAtencion primaria2001
[Direct costs to primary care of chronic bronchitis. Analysis of a prospective study].
Article in Atencion primaria, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- The global impact of non-communicable diseases on healthcare spending and national income: a systematic review.European journal of epidemiology · 2015Pooled it
- Determinants and predictors of the cost of COPD in primary care: a Spanish perspective.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2008Article
- [Cost and management of asthma attacks treated in primary care (COAX Study)].Atencion primaria · 2005Article
- [What can we do about the scant introduction of spirometry into primary care?].Atencion primaria · 2004Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the consumption of the direct health resources of primary care (PC) in Spain by a cohort of patients with chronic bronchial pathology: chronic bronchitis (CB) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
designProspective cohort study of patients with CB and COPD monitored in PC in Spain. The first 10 adult patients who attended at random each researcher's clinic and who were diagnosed as suffering an exacerbation of their chronic bronchial pathology were included. Scheduled follow-up visits for a year evaluated the cohort's consumption of health resources. Direct health costs were analysed.
results268 doctors, with 2414 patients, took part. 1510 patients completed the 12 months follow-up (62.6%). All the patients received pharmacological treatment for their pulmonary disease. The most common complementary investigations performed were: general blood analysis (1.5 per patient/year), chest x-ray (1.2) and ECG (0.9), followed by spirometry (0.5) and arterial gasometry (0.4). Mean number of exacerbations per year were 1.9; and admissions, 0.2. Overall cost, including tests, medical visits, hospital expenditure and pharmacological treatment, was 420,264,000 pesetas for the entire cohort. The direct annual cost per patient ran at 278,321 pesetas. The cost caused by patients treated with Cefixime on the first exacerbations was 77,365 pesetas less, which was mostly due to less hospital expense.
conclusionsThe direct annual cost per patient with CB or COPD is high, above the cost of other chronic respiratory pathologies such as bronchial asthma. There are notably greater hospital costs for CB and COPD, explained by these patients' mean greater age and the non-reversible and progressive deterioration of their respiratory function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
11334575PMC7675966W1967488283What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.