Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11333864›Full record

ReviewJournal of medical genetics2001

Methylation matters.

J F Costello, C Plass

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of medical genetics, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 161 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
161citing papers in PubMed
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

161 citing papers in PubMed, 437 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. The Effects ofCells · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Revealing Cell-Free Mitochondrial DNA Breakage Patterns as Novel Biomarkers for Sepsis.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Optimizing the lyophilization ofArtificial cells, nanomedicine, and biotechnology · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Review

101 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J F CostelloThe Brain Tumor Research Center and the Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, 2340 Sutter, Room N261, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143-0875, USA. jcostello@cc.ucsf.edu
C Plass
The Ohio State University · US

Funding

Translational Therapeutics Research Program (TT)P30CA016058 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Tasleem J Padamsee · 1985 to 2026
$132.3M
GENOMIC SCANNING IN ORAL CANCERR01DE013123 · NIDCR · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI PLASS, CHRISTOPH · 2000 to 2011
$2.3M
CLONING AND CHARACTERIZING NEW IMPRINTED GENESR01GM058269 · NIGMS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI PLASS, CHRISTOPH · 1998 to 2000
$219k
METHYLATION IN AMLR21CA080912 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI PLASS, CHRISTOPH · 1999 to 2000
$110k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA16058NCI NIH HHS R21 CA80912NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE13123NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM58269
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA methylation is not just for basic scientists any more. There is a growing awareness in the medical field that having the correct pattern of genomic methylation is essential for healthy cells and organs. If methylation patterns are not properly established or maintained, disorders as diverse as mental retardation, immune deficiency, and sporadic or inherited cancers may follow. Through inappropriate silencing of growth regulating genes and simultaneous destabilisation of whole chromosomes, methylation defects help create a chaotic state from which cancer cells evolve. Methylation defects are present in cells before the onset of obvious malignancy and therefore cannot be explained simply as a consequence of a deregulated cancer cell. Researchers are now able to detect with exquisite sensitivity the cells harbouring methylation defects, sometimes months or years before the time when cancer is clinically detectable. Furthermore, aberrant methylation of specific genes has been directly linked with the tumour response to chemotherapy and patient survival. Advances in our ability to observe the methylation status of the entire cancer cell genome have led us to the unmistakable conclusion that methylation abnormalities are far more prevalent than expected. This methylomics approach permits the integration of an ever growing repertoire of methylation defects with the genetic alterations catalogued from tumours over the past two decades. Here we discuss the current knowledge of DNA methylation in normal cells and disease states, and how this relates directly to our current understanding of the mechanisms by which tumours arise.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationGene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic5-MethylcytosineChromosome AberrationsCpG IslandsCytosineDNA Transposable ElementsGenomicsHumansNeoplasmsOncogenesSyndrome5-MethylcytosineCytosineDNA Transposable Elements

Identifiers

PMID11333864
PMCPMC1734882
OpenAlexW4233749076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.