Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11333226›Full record

ArticleGenetics2001

Expansions and contractions in 36-bp minisatellites by gene conversion in yeast.

F Pâques, G F Richard, J E Haber

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Comparative genomics and molecular dynamics of DNA repeats in eukaryotes.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2008
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Break-induced replication: a review and an example in budding yeast.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2001
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

F PâquesRosenstiel Center and Department of Biology, Brandeis University, 415 South St., Waltham, MA 02454-9110, USA.
G F Richard
J E Haber
Brandeis University · USUniversité Paris Cité · FR

Funding

Recombination Mechanisms in Yeast Cell DifferentiationR37GM020056 · NIGMS · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI HABER, JAMES E · 2007 to 2016
$5.5M
RECOMBINATION MECHANISMS IN YEAST CELL DIFFERENTIATIONR01GM020056 · NIGMS · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI HABER, JAMES E · 1985 to 2006
$3.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM20056
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The instability of simple tandem repeats, such as human minisatellite loci, has been suggested to arise by gene conversions. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, a double-strand break (DSB) was created by the HO endonuclease so that DNA polymerases associated with gap repair must traverse an artificial minisatellite of perfect 36-bp repeats or a yeast Y' minisatellite containing diverged 36-bp repeats. Gene conversions are frequently accompanied by changes in repeat number when the template contains perfect repeats. When the ends of the DSB have nonhomologous tails of 47 and 70 nucleotides that must be removed before repair DNA synthesis can begin, 16% of gene conversions had rearrangements, most of which were contractions, almost always in the recipient locus. When efficient removal of nonhomologous tails was prevented in rad1 and msh2 strains, repair was reduced 10-fold, but among survivors there was a 10-fold reduction in contractions. Half the remaining events were expansions. A similar decrease in the contraction rate was observed when the template was modified so that DSB ends were homologous to the template; and here, too, half of the remaining rearrangements were expansions. In this case, efficient repair does not require RAD1 and MSH2, consistent with our previous observations. In addition, without nonhomologous DSB ends, msh2 and rad1 mutations did not affect the frequency or the distribution of rearrangements. We conclude that the presence of nonhomologous ends alters the mechanism of DSB repair, likely through early recruitment of repair proteins including Msh2p and Rad1p, resulting in more frequent contractions of repeated sequences.

Indexed as

Gene ConversionSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsBase SequenceDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA DamageDNA PrimersDNA RepairDNA Repair EnzymesEndonucleasesFungal ProteinsMinisatellite RepeatsMutS Homolog 2 ProteinRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidSaccharomyces cerevisiaeDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA PrimersDNA Repair EnzymesEndonucleasesFungal ProteinsMSH2 protein, S cerevisiaeMutS Homolog 2 ProteinRAD1 protein, S cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

Identifiers

PMID11333226
PMCPMC1461658
OpenAlexW1842945194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.