Airway surface liquid: end of the controversy?

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Drying of virus-containing particles: modelling effects of droplet origin and composition.Journal of environmental health science & engineering · 2021
   Article
2. The group I pilin glycan affects type IVa pilus hydrophobicity and twitching motility in Pseudomonas aeruginosa 1244.Microbiology (Reading, England) · 2015
   Article
3. Respiratory physiology on a chip.Scientifica · 2012
   Review
4. In Situ Quantification of Glucose Concentration in Airway Surface Liquid With Functionalized ZnO Nanorod-Coated Microelectrodes.Journal of analytical & bioanalytical techniques · 2011
   Article
5. Glucose depletion in the airway surface liquid is essential for sterility of the airways.PloS one · 2011
   Article
6. Water permeability in human airway epithelium.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2005
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Airway surface liquid osmolality measured using fluorophore-encapsulated liposomes.2001

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as