Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11329468›Full record

Trial reportClinical and diagnostic laboratory immunology2001

Importance of complement source in measuring meningococcal bactericidal titers.

G F Santos, R R Deck, J Donnelly, W Blackwelder, D M Granoff

Open access · diamondAbstract readClinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical and diagnostic laboratory immunology, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 113 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. [Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. A New Tool for Complement Research:Frontiers in immunology · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

G F SantosChiron Corporation, Emeryville, California, USA.
R R Deck
J Donnelly
W Blackwelder
D M Granoff
Chiron (Norway) · NOInnovative Biologics (United States) · US

Funding

Novel vaccine strategies for prevention of N. meningitidis group B diseaseR01AI046464 · NIAID · OMVAX, INC. · PI MOE, GREGORY ROBERT · 2000 to 2024
$12.1M
NIAID NIH HHS AI46464NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI046464NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI456464
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Complement-mediated bactericidal antibodies in serum confer protection against meningococcal disease. The minimum protective titer is estimated to be between 1:4 and 1:8 when measured by the Goldschneider assay performed with human complement, the assay used in the 1960s to establish the correlation between bactericidal antibodies and protection. A more recently described bactericidal assay standardized by an international consortium uses rabbit complement, which is known to augment bactericidal titers. To define a protective titer measured by the standardized assay, we compared bactericidal titers against serogroup C strains measured by this assay to titers measured by the assay described by Goldschneider et al. A titer of > or =1:128 measured by the standardized assay was needed to predict with > or =80% certainty a positive titer of > or =1:4 as measured by the Goldschneider assay. However, the majority of samples with titers of 1:4 measured by the Goldschneider assay had titers of <1:128 when measured by the standardized assay. Therefore, by the results of the standardized assay such persons would be falsely categorized as being susceptible to disease. In conclusion, high bactericidal titers measured with the standardized assay performed with rabbit complement are predictive of protection, but no threshold titer is both sensitive and specific for predicting a positive titer measured by the Goldschneider assay using human complement. Up to 10% of the U.S. adult population lacks intrinsic bactericidal activity against serogroup C strains in serum and can serve as complement donors. Therefore, use of the Goldschneider assay or an equivalent assay performed with human complement is preferred over assays that use rabbit complement.

Indexed as

AdultBiological AssayChild, PreschoolComplement System ProteinsHumansImmunity, InnateInfantMeningococcal InfectionsMeningococcal VaccinesNeisseria meningitidisComplement System ProteinsMeningococcal Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID11329468
PMCPMC96111
OpenAlexW2168225301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.