Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11327763›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular biology2001

Flagellin polymerisation control by a cytosolic export chaperone.

F Auvray, J Thomas, G M Fraser, C Hughes

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular biology, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 79 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed, 160 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Bacteria with a mouth: Discovery and new insights into cell surface structure and macromolecule transport.Proceedings of the Japan Academy. Series B, Physical and biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  13. Flagella, Chemotaxis and Surface Sensing.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

F AuvrayDepartment of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1QP, UK.
J Thomas
G M Fraser
C Hughes
University of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 040330
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Assembly of the long helical filament of the bacterial flagellum requires polymerisation of ca 20,000 flagellin (FliC) monomeric subunits into the growing structure extending from the cell surface. Here, we show that export of Salmonella flagellin is facilitated specifically by a cytosolic protein, FliS, and that FliS binds to the FliC C-terminal helical domain, which contributes to stabilisation of flagellin subunit interactions during polymerisation. Stable complexes of FliS with flagellin were assembled efficiently in vitro, apparently by FliS homodimers binding to FliC monomers. The data suggest that FliS acts as a substrate-specific chaperone, preventing premature interaction of newly synthesised flagellin subunits in the cytosol. Compatible with this view, FliS was able to prevent in vitro polymerisation of FliC into filaments.

Indexed as

Bacterial ProteinsBiopolymersChromatography, GelCytosolDimerizationFlagellaFlagellinMicroscopy, ElectronMolecular ChaperonesProtein BindingProtein SubunitsProtein TransportSalmonella typhimuriumSequence DeletionSolubilitySubstrate SpecificityBacterial ProteinsBiopolymersFlagellinFliS protein, BacteriaMolecular ChaperonesProtein Subunits

Identifiers

PMID11327763
PMCPMC2528291
OpenAlexW2079851718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.