Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11326011›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2001

Use of subgenic 18S ribosomal DNA PCR and sequencing for genus and genotype identification of acanthamoebae from humans with keratitis and from sewage sludge.

J M Schroeder, G C Booton, J Hay, I A Niszl, D V Seal, M B Markus, P A Fuerst, T J Byers

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 252 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
252citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
12.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

252 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 596 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Expert review of anti-infective therapy · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. High prevalence ofParasite epidemiology and control · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Genetic Classification of a Novel Genotype of the GenusTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2026
    Article
  9. Microbiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Molecular Typing ofMicroorganisms · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Complicated Diagnosis and Treatment of Rare PainlessJournal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

192 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

J M SchroederDepartment of Molecular Genetics, The Ohio State University, 484 W. 12th Ave., Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
G C Booton
J Hay
I A Niszl
D V Seal
M B Markus
P A Fuerst
T J Byers
The Ohio State University · USUniversity of the Witwatersrand · ZAInstitute of Ophthalmology · MXWestern Infirmary · GB

Funding

DNA PROBES FOR ACANTHAMOEBA KERATITISR01EY009073 · NEI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI FUERST, PAUL A · 1992 to 2007
$1.9M
NEI NIH HHS EY09073NEI NIH HHS R01 EY009073
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study identified subgenic PCR amplimers from 18S rDNA that were (i) highly specific for the genus Acanthamoeba, (ii) obtainable from all known genotypes, and (iii) useful for identification of individual genotypes. A 423- to 551-bp Acanthamoeba-specific amplimer ASA.S1 obtained with primers JDP1 and JDP2 was the most reliable for purposes i and ii. A variable region within this amplimer also identified genotype clusters, but purpose iii was best achieved with sequencing of the genotype-specific amplimer GTSA.B1. Because this amplimer could be obtained from any eukaryote, axenic Acanthamoeba cultures were required for its study. GTSA.B1, produced with primers CRN5 and 1137, extended between reference bp 1 and 1475. Genotypic identification relied on three segments: bp 178 to 355, 705 to 926, and 1175 to 1379. ASA.S1 was obtained from single amoeba, from cultures of all known 18S rDNA genotypes, and from corneal scrapings of Scottish patients with suspected Acanthamoeba keratitis (AK). The AK PCR findings were consistent with culture results for 11 of 15 culture-positive specimens and detected Acanthamoeba in one of nine culture-negative specimens. ASA.S1 sequences were examined for 6 of the 11 culture-positive isolates and were most closely associated with genotypic cluster T3-T4-T11. A similar distance analysis using GTSA.B1 sequences identified nine South African AK-associated isolates as genotype T4 and three isolates from sewage sludge as genotype T5. Our results demonstrate the usefulness of 18S ribosomal DNA PCR amplimers ASA.S1 and GTSA.B1 for Acanthamoeba-specific detection and reliable genotyping, respectively, and provide further evidence that T4 is the predominant genotype in AK.

Indexed as

AcanthamoebaAcanthamoeba KeratitisAnimalsCorneaDNA PrimersDNA, ProtozoanDNA, RibosomalGenotypeHumansMolecular Sequence DataPhylogenyPolymerase Chain ReactionRNA, Ribosomal, 18SSensitivity and SpecificitySequence Analysis, DNASewageDNA PrimersDNA, ProtozoanDNA, RibosomalRNA, Ribosomal, 18SSewage

Identifiers

PMID11326011
PMCPMC88046
OpenAlexW2131321407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.