Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11321366›Full record

ArticleChromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology2001

Comparative chromosome and mitochondrial DNA analyses and phylogenetic relationships within common voles (Microtus, Arvicolidae).

N A Mazurok, N V Rubtsova, A A Isaenko, M E Pavlova, S Y Slobodyanyuk, T B Nesterova, S M Zakian

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Assisted reproductive technologies inReproductive medicine and biology · 2019
    Review
  8. New record ofZooKeys · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Genome-wide comparative chromosome maps of Arvicola amphibius, Dicrostonyx torquatus, and Myodes rutilus.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2016
    Article
  13. Chromosome synapsis and recombination in the hybrids between chromosome races of the common vole Microtus aravalis: "arvalis" and "obscurus".Doklady biological sciences : proceedings of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Biological sciences sections · 2014
    Article
  14. Rapid, independent, and extensive amplification of telomeric repeats in pericentromeric regions in karyotypes of arvicoline rodents.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2011
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Chromosomal evolution of Arvicolinae (Cricetidae, Rodentia). III. Karyotype relationships of ten Microtus species.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2010
    Article
  19. Chromosomal evolution of Arvicolinae (Cricetidae, Rodentia). I. The genome homology of tundra vole, field vole, mouse and golden hamster revealed by comparative chromosome painting.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2007
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

N A MazurokInstitute of Cytology and Genetics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Siberian Department, Novosibirsk.
N V Rubtsova
A A Isaenko
M E Pavlova
S Y Slobodyanyuk
T B Nesterova
S M Zakian

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The four species of common voles within the genus Microtus--M. kirgisorum, M. transcaspicus, M. arvalis, and M. rossiaemeridionalis--are so closely related that neither morphological features nor paleontological evidence allow clarification of their phylogeny. Analysis of vole karyotypes and mitochondrial DNA sequences, therefore, is essential for determining their phylogenetic relationships. A comparison of high resolution GTG-banding patterns allows us to ascertain the similarity between the karyotypes of these species, revealing that they are composed of rearrangements of the same chromosomal elements. Based on this analysis, we propose possible routes of chromosomal divergence involved in speciation within this group of voles and construct a phylogenetic tree of their karyotypes. We suggest that two different karyotypic variants existed during the course of vole evolution--one resulting in M. rossiaemeridionalis and M. transcaspicus, the other, M. kirgisorum and M. arvalis. As an alternative approach FITCH and KITSCH computer programs were used to construct a phylogenetic tree of vole molecular evolution based on a pairwise comparison of mitochondrial cytochrome b sequences and the divergence time of the species was determined. The correlation between the trees constructed using karyologic and molecular approaches is discussed in the context of other available data.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAnimalsArvicolinaeChromosome BandingChromosomesCytochrome b GroupDNA, MitochondrialKaryotypingPhylogenySoftwareCytochrome b GroupDNA, Mitochondrial

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.