Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11320065›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA

Collaborative efforts for representing nursing concepts in computer-based systems: international perspectives.

A Coenen, H F Marin, H A Park, S Bakken

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Quantifying care coordination using natural language processing and domain-specific ontology.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2015
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Evidence-based nursing practice: a call to action for nursing informatics.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

A CoenenInternational Council of Nurses, Geneva, Switzerland.
H F Marin
H A Park
S Bakken

Funding

CODING AND CLASSIFICATION SYSTEMS FOR AMBULATORY CARER01NR004423 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO · PI BAKKEN, SUZANNE · 1998 to 1999
–
NINR NIH HHS NR04423
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current nursing terminology efforts have converged toward meeting the demand for a reference terminology for nursing concepts by building on the foundation of existing interface and administrative terminologies and by collaborating with terminology efforts across the spectrum of health care. In this article, the authors illustrate how collaboration is promoting convergence toward a reference terminology for nursing by briefly summarizing a wide range of exemplary activities. These include: 1) the International Classification of Nursing Practice (ICNP) activities of the International Council of Nurses (ICN), 2) work in Brazil and Korea that has contributed to, and been stimulated by, ICNP developments, 3) efforts in the United States to improve understanding of the different types of terminologies needed in nursing and to promote harmonization and linking among them, and 4) current nursing participation in major multi-disciplinary standards initiatives. Although early nursing terminology work occurred primarily in isolation and resulted in some duplicative efforts, the activities summarized in this article demonstrate a tremendous level of collaboration and convergence not only in the discipline of nursing but in multi-disciplinary standards initiatives. These efforts are an important prerequisite for ensuring that nursing concepts are represented in computer-based systems in a manner that facilitates multi-purpose use at local, national, regional, and international levels.

Indexed as

Medical Informatics ApplicationsTerminology as TopicVocabulary, ControlledNursing

Identifiers

PMID11320065
PMCPMC131028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.