Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11316684›Full record

ArticleArchives of disease in childhood2001

Adrenaline syringes are vastly over prescribed.

D J Unsworth

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of disease in childhood, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Prescription rates of adrenaline auto-injectors for children in UK general practice: a retrospective cohort study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2017
    Article
  4. Anaphylaxis from bee pollen supplement.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2012
    Article
  5. When doctors disagree: a qualitative study of doctors' and parents' views on the risks of childhood food allergy.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2008
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Food allergy in childhood.Archives of disease in childhood · 2003
    Article
  10. Fine needle aspiration biopsy of thyroid nodules.Archives of disease in childhood · 2001
    Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

D J UnsworthSouthmead Hospital, Westbury-on-Trym, Bristol BS10 5NB, UK.
Southmead Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

AnaphylaxisChildEpinephrineFood HypersensitivityHealth Services MisuseHumansInjectionsPractice Patterns, Physicians'SyringesEpinephrine

Identifiers

PMID11316684
PMCPMC1718757
OpenAlexW2150976806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.