SynthesisCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne2001
Systematic overview of the evidence for brachytherapy in clinically localized prostate cancer.
Synthesis in CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.
- An update on focal therapy for prostate cancer.Nature reviews. Urology · 2016Review
- Urinary adverse effects of pelvic radiotherapy.Translational andrology and urology · 2014Review
- A reference set of health utilities for long-term survivors of prostate cancer: population-based data from Ontario, Canada.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2013Article
- Low-dose rate brachytherapy for patients with low- or intermediate-risk prostate cancer: A systematic review.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2013Review
- Overall information needs of early-stage prostate cancer patients over a decade: highly variable and remarkably stable.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2009Article
- Psychometric properties of a prostate cancer radiation late toxicity questionnaire.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2007Article
- Prostate cancer in the elderly.International urology and nephrology · 2005Review
- Unforeseen complication of brachytherapy.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2004Article
- What's a man to do? Treatment options for localized prostate cancer.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2004Review
- Seed implant brachytherapy for prostate cancer.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2001Article
- Seed implant brachytherapy for prostate cancer.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2001Article
- Brachytherapy for prostate cancer: effective, but...?CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2001Article
- Evidence-based guideline recommendations on low-dose rate brachytherapy in patients with low- or intermediate-risk prostate cancer.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du CanadaArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBrachytherapy (permanent implantation of radioactive seeds) has emerged as an alternative to existing standard therapy with radical prostatectomy or external beam radiotherapy in the treatment of clinically localized (T1 and T2) prostate cancer. The Genitourinary Cancer Disease Site Group of the Cancer Care Ontario Practice Guidelines Initiative examined the role of brachytherapy in treating clinically localized prostate cancer.
methodsA systematic review of articles published from 1988 to April 1999, retrieved through a search of MEDLINE and CANCERLIT databases, was combined with a consensus interpretation of the evidence in the context of conventional practice.
resultsAlthough there were no randomized trials comparing brachytherapy with standard treatment, evidence was available from 13 case series and 3 cohort studies. Rates of freedom from biochemical failure (biochemically no evidence of disease [bNED]) varied considerably from one series to another and were highly dependent on tumour stage, grade and pretreatment serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels. Results in patients with favourable tumours (T1 or T2 tumour, Gleason score of 6 or lower, serum PSA level of 10 ng/mL [microgram/L] or less) were comparable to those in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. Acute urinary retention was reported in 1%-14% of patients. Long-term sequelae occurred in less than 5% of patients and included urinary incontinence, cystitis, urethral strictures and proctitis. Sexual potency was maintained after implantation in 86%-96% of patients.
interpretationAt present, there is insufficient evidence to recommend the use of brachytherapy over current standard therapy for localized prostate cancer. Brachytherapy using transrectal ultrasound guidance for seed implantation is promising in terms of freedom from biochemical failure in selected patients with early-stage prostate cancer. Brachytherapy is currently available outside of clinical trials, but whenever possible patients should be asked to participate in randomized trials comparing brachytherapy and current standard therapy. Brachytherapy should be available to selected patients (those with T1c or T2a tumours, a Gleason score of 6 or lower and a serum PSA level of 10 micrograms/L or less), after discussion of the available data and potential adverse effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
11314451PMC80925W2149318094What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.