Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11313990›Full record

ArticleOncogene2001

Structural and functional involvement of p53 in BER in vitro and in vivo.

H Offer, M Milyavsky, N Erez, D Matas, I Zurer, C C Harris, V Rotter

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Oncogene, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. p53 in the DNA-Damage-Repair Process.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2016
    Review
  7. The protein p17 signaling pathways in cancer.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2013
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

H OfferDepartment of Molecular Cell Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel.
M Milyavsky
N Erez
D Matas
I Zurer
C C Harris
V Rotter
Weizmann Institute of Science · ILGenesis Laboratories · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

p53 is involved in several DNA repair pathways. Some of these require the specific transactivation of p53-dependent genes and others involve direct interactions between the p53 protein and DNA repair associated proteins. Previously, we have shown that p53 acts directly in Base Excision Repair (BER) when assayed under in vitro conditions. Our present data indicate that this involvement is independent of the transcriptional activity of the p53 molecule. We found that under both in vitro and in vivo conditions, a p53 transactivation-deficient molecule, p53-22-23 was more efficient in BER activity than was wild type p53. However, mutations in the core domain or C-terminal alterations strongly reduced p53-mediated BER activity. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that the involvement of p53 in BER activity, a housekeeping DNA repair pathway, is a prompt and immediate one that does not involve the activation of p53 transactivation-dependent mechanisms, but rather concerns with the p53 protein itself. In an endogenous DNA damage status p53 is active in BER pathways as a protein and not as a transcription factor.

Indexed as

Cell LineDNA RepairHumansMyeloid CellsProtein Structure, TertiaryTranscriptional ActivationTumor Suppressor Protein p53Tumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID11313990
OpenAlexW2325787473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.