ArticleBone marrow transplantation2001
Detection of breast cancer cell contamination in leukapheresis product by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
Article in Bone marrow transplantation, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Role of maspin in cancer.Clinical and translational medicine · 2013Article
- Quantitative real-time RT-PCR of disseminated tumor cells in combination with immunomagnetic cell enrichment.Molecular biotechnology · 2006Article
- Real-time RT-PCR detection of disseminated tumour cells in bone marrow has superior prognostic significance in comparison with circulating tumour cells in patients with breast cancer.British journal of cancer · 2006Article
- Real-time RT-PCR correlates with immunocytochemistry for the detection of disseminated epithelial cells in bone marrow aspirates of patients with breast cancer.British journal of cancer · 2004Article
- The detection of circulating breast cancer cells in blood.Journal of clinical pathology · 2004Review
- Application of a multigene reverse transcription-PCR assay for detection of mammaglobin and complementary transcribed genes in breast cancer lymph nodes.Clinical chemistry · 2002Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Identification of sensitive techniques for breast cancer cell detection might be relevant for high-dose chemotherapy programs with autologous stem cell transplantation. We investigated the feasibility of Maspin, Mammaglobin and c-ErbB-2 amplification by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR) for the detection of breast cancer cells in leukaphereses. Expression of the three markers was determined in primary breast cancers and cell lines. Peripheral blood (PB), bone marrow (BM), and leukapheresis samples from patients with malignancies other than breast cancer were used as controls. Sensitivity was evaluated by dilution of primary tumors and cell lines with mononuclear blood cells. We found expression of the three markers in all primary tumors and most cell lines. No blood specimen from control patients had the Maspin transcript, while only one was positive for Mammaglobin. Weak c-ErbB-2 expression was detectable in most PB, all BM and all leukapheresis samples from controls. We observed a low sensitivity of Maspin RQ-PCR and a sensitivity of Mammaglobin RQ-PCR up to one tumor cell in 10(6) mononuclear cells. One out of 18 leukaphereses from breast cancer patients screened for the presence of Mammaglobin mRNA was positive. We conclude that Mammaglobin RQ-PCR might be a useful tool for detection of leukapheresis contamination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.