Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11312410›Full record

ReviewThorax2001

Pneumonia and pregnancy.

W S Lim, J T Macfarlane, C L Colthorpe

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Thorax, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Association betweenFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. MS, pregnancy and COVID-19.Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England) · 2020
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Acute respiratory failure in pregnancy.Obstetric medicine · 2015
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Treatment of community-acquired lower respiratory tract infections during pregnancy.American journal of respiratory medicine : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2003
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

W S LimRespiratory Infection Research Group, Respiratory Medicine, Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK.
J T Macfarlane
C L Colthorpe

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

PneumoniaPregnancy Complications, InfectiousAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntifungal AgentsAntiviral AgentsFemaleHumansPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeRisk FactorsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntifungal AgentsAntiviral Agents

Identifiers

PMID11312410
PMCPMC1746055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.