Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11310716›Full record

ReviewPaediatric drugs2001

Aetiology and management of children with acute fever of unknown origin.

G O Akpede, G I Akenzua

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Paediatric drugs, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

G O AkpedeDepartment of Paediatrics, College of Medicine, Ambrose Alli University, Ekpoma, Nigeria. public@fidelsemper.com
G I Akenzua
Ambrose Alli University · NGUniversity of Benin · NG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This is part I of a 2-part paper on fever of unknown origin (FUO) in children. FUO is best defined as fever without obvious source on initial clinical examination and then classified into acute (illness of < or =1 week's duration) and prolonged (>7 to 10 days' duration). Aetiologically, there is a marked overlap between acute and prolonged FUO, and infections are major players in both. Age, climate, local epidemiology and host factors are the major aetiological factors that should be considered in the choice of definitive tests. Depending on age, serious bacterial infections (including bacteraemia, meningitis and urinary tract infection) occur in 3 to 20% of cases of acute FUO. Prevention of mortality and sequelae from these infections, particularly bacteraemia and meningitis, is of particular concern in acute FUO. An individualised approach, based on clinical evaluation supplemented with screening and definitive laboratory tests to determine the need for empiric antibiotic therapy and hospitalisation, seems to be the best approach to acute FUO (although this may be less applicable to neonates and infants younger than 90 days, particularly those aged 0 to 7 days). The place of laboratory tests, empiric antibiotic therapy and hospitalisation are important issues that are likely to remain so for some time.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAge FactorsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteremiaBacterial InfectionsChild, PreschoolClimateFever of Unknown OriginHematologic TestsHumansInfantInfant, NewbornPractice Guidelines as TopicRisk FactorsVirus DiseasesAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID11310716
OpenAlexW2004307629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.