Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11309631›Full record

ReviewNature2001

Challenges and opportunities for development of an AIDS vaccine.

G J Nabel

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Nanovaccine: A novel approach in immunization.Journal of cellular physiology · 2019
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Synthetic carbohydrate antigens for HIV vaccine design.Current opinion in chemical biology · 2013
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Behavioral and biomedical combination strategies for HIV prevention.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2012
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

G J NabelVaccine Research Center, National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-3005, USA. gnabel@nih.gov

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Among the devastating consequences of AIDS has been its epidemic spread in the developing world. The disease has caused unprecedented suffering, debilitation, loss of life and disruption of family, social and economic stability. Because of the considerable expense and logistical difficulty in providing antiviral drugs to populations infected with the human immunodeficiency virus throughout the world, the biomedical community is looking towards vaccines to help solve this compelling problem.

Indexed as

AIDS VaccinesAdjuvants, ImmunologicAnimalsHIVHIV AntibodiesHIV AntigensHIV InfectionsHumansT-Lymphocytes, CytotoxicVaccines, AttenuatedVaccines, SyntheticAdjuvants, ImmunologicAIDS VaccinesHIV AntibodiesHIV AntigensVaccines, AttenuatedVaccines, Synthetic

Identifiers

PMID11309631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.