ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology2001
Characterization of the effects of isoprostanes on platelet aggregation in human whole blood.
Article in British journal of pharmacology, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Isoprostanes in Veterinary Medicine: Beyond a Biomarker.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- The 5-series F(2)-isoprostanes possess no vasomotor effects in the rat thoracic aorta, the human internal mammary artery and the human saphenous vein.British journal of pharmacology · 2002Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We tested the effects of 11 commercially-available isoprostanes on platelet aggregation directly or when triggered by the thromboxane receptor agonist U46619 or collagen in healthy human citrated blood using a whole blood aggregometer. None of the isoprostanes tested triggered aggregation alone, nor facilitated aggregation by a sub-threshold dose of U46619 or collagen. Five isoprostanes inhibited aggregation (rank order of potency 8-iso PGE(1)>8-iso PGE(2)>8-iso PGF(2alpha)>8-iso PGF(3alpha)>8-iso-13,14-dihydro-15-keto PGF(2alpha)). Blood incubated with LPS to induce a gross inflammatory response exhibited a time dependent (2 - 12 h) reduction in aggregation to U46619 but maintained a consistent response to collagen. Under these conditions, as in control blood, none of the isoprostanes tested induced aggregation. In fact, the inhibitory actions of isoprostanes on U46619-induced aggregation were enhanced in blood treated with LPS. L-NAME inhibited aggregation induced by U46619 in fresh blood and in blood treated with LPS. In the presence of L-NAME, (with or without LPS) none of the isoprostanes tested induced aggregation but retained their inhibitory action. Thus, in human whole blood the action of 8-iso PGE(1), 8-iso PGE(2), 8-iso PGF(2alpha), 8-iso PGF(3alpha), and 8-iso-13,14-dihydro-15-keto PGF(2alpha) is antiaggregatory. Moreover, this inhibitory capacity is still apparent and may be enhanced in blood subjected to inflammatory stimulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.