ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology2001
Novel histamine H(3)-receptor antagonists and partial agonists with a non-aminergic structure.
Article in British journal of pharmacology, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Serotonin and beyond-a tribute to Manfred Göthert (1939-2019).Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2021Review
- A search for functional histamine H4 receptors in the human, guinea pig and mouse brain.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2015Article
- Generation of a homology model of the human histamine H(3) receptor for ligand docking and pharmacophore-based screening.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We determined the affinities of eight novel histamine H(3)-receptor ligands (ethers and carbamates) for H(3)-receptor binding sites and their agonistic/antagonistic effects in two functional H(3)-receptor models. The compounds differ from histamine in that the ethylamine chain is replaced by a propyloxy chain; in the three ethers mentioned below (FUB 335, 373 and 407), R is n-pentyl, 3-methylbutyl and 3,3-dimethylbutyl, respectively. The compounds monophasically inhibited [(3)H]-N(alpha)-methylhistamine binding to mouse cerebral cortex membranes (pK(i) 7.51 - 9.53). The concentration-response curve of histamine for its inhibitory effect on the electrically evoked [(3)H]-noradrenaline overflow from mouse cortex slices was shifted to the right by these compounds (apparent pA(2) 6.61 - 8.00). Only FUB 373 and 407 inhibited the evoked overflow by themselves (intrinsic activities 0.3 and 0.4); these effects were counteracted by the H(3)-receptor antagonist clobenpropit. [(35)S]-GTPgammaS binding to mouse cortex membranes was stimulated by the H(3)-receptor agonist (R)-alpha-methylhistamine in a manner sensitive to clobenpropit. Among the novel compounds only FUB 373 and 407 stimulated [(35)S]-GTPgammaS binding (intrinsic activities 0.6 and 0.4). In conclusion, the novel compounds are partial H(3)-receptor agonists (FUB 373 and 407) or H(3)-receptor antagonists; comparison with FUB 335 shows that the transition from antagonist to agonist is caused by a slight structural change. A protonated N atom in the side chain is not necessary for agonism at H(3) receptors, proposing a receptor-ligand interaction different from that of classical agonists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.