Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11307592›Full record

ArticleMycopathologia2001

Penicillium marneffei: types and drug susceptibility.

P Imwidthaya, K Thipsuvan, A Chaiprasert, S Danchaivijitra, R Sutthent, J Jearanaisilavong

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Mycopathologia, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Health Risks Associated with Exposure to Filamentous Fungi.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2017
    Review
  8. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

P ImwidthayaDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10700, Thailand. sipiw@mahidol.ac.th
K Thipsuvan
A Chaiprasert
S Danchaivijitra
R Sutthent
J Jearanaisilavong

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The PCR fingerprints of 30 Penicillium marneffei isolates from Chiang Rai in Northern Thailand and Bangkok in central Thailand were studied through use of single-nucleotide primers (GACA)4 and the phage M13 core sequence. Discrimination of fingerprint patterns was based on differences in the number of major bands. The P. marneffei isolates were divided into four types, i.e., A, B, C, and D. Type A was found in two isolates from Chiang Rai (6.7%). Types B and C respectively were found in two (6.7%) and one (3.3%) isolates from Bangkok. The predominate type D (83.3%) was found in isolates obtained from Chiang Rai and Bangkok. The PCR fingerprinting method was found to be useful for the epidemiological study of P. marneffei, a dimorphic opportunistic fungus and an emerging pathogen in the HIV pandemic. In vitro drug susceptibility testing by broth macrodilution to four antifungal agents against the yeast form of P. marneffei was performed. The MIC ranges for amphotericin B, fluconazole, itraconazole, and ketoconazole were 0.125-0.5, 4.0-8.0, < 0.032, and < 0.125 microgram/ml respectively.

Indexed as

Antifungal AgentsDNA FingerprintingDNA, FungalElectrophoresisFemaleHumansMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMycosesPenicilliumPolymerase Chain ReactionThailandAntifungal AgentsDNA, Fungal

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.