ArticlePharmacoEconomics2001
Cost-effectiveness analysis of inhaled zanamivir in the treatment of influenza A and B in high-risk patients.
Article in PharmacoEconomics, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Spray-Dried Inhalable Favipiravir Dry Powder Formulation for Influenza Therapy: Preparation andCurrent drug delivery · 2026Article
- Effects of seasonal and pandemic influenza on health-related quality of life, work and school absence in England: Results from the Flu Watch cohort study.Influenza and other respiratory viruses · 2018Article
- The impact of influenza on the health related quality of life in China: an EQ-5D survey.BMC infectious diseases · 2017Article
- Cost-effectiveness analysis of quadrivalent versus trivalent influenza vaccine in Taiwan: A lifetime multi-cohort model.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2017Article
- Article
- Cost-utility of rapid polymerase chain reaction-based influenza testing for high-risk emergency department patients.Annals of emergency medicine · 2013Article
- Implementing an influenza vaccination programme for adults aged ≥65 years in Poland: a cost-effectiveness analysis.Clinical drug investigation · 2012Article
- The impact of pandemic influenza H1N1 on health-related quality of life: a prospective population-based study.PloS one · 2011Article
- Review
- Antiviral agents for influenza: a comparison of cost-effectiveness data.PharmacoEconomics · 2005Review
- [Treatment for viral respiratory infections: Principles of action, strategies, and future prospects].Der Internist · 2004Review
- Effect of influenza treatment with oseltamivir on health outcome and costs in otherwise healthy children.Clinical drug investigation · 2004Article
- Management of influenza symptoms in healthy adults.Journal of general internal medicine · 2003Article
- Current research on respiratory viral infections: Fourth International Symposium.Antiviral research · 2002Review
- Clinical evaluation of the ZstatFlu-II test: a chemiluminescent rapid diagnostic test for influenza virus.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2002Article
- Zanamivir: an update of its use in influenza.Drugs · 2002Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the cost effectiveness of zanamivir 10 mg twice daily for 5 days in the treatment of influenza in high-risk patients.
designBootstrap cost-effectiveness analysis incorporating within-trial analysis of pooled patient-level cost and effect data.
settingUK unit costs and utilities applied to high-risk patients drawn from 6 multinational clinical trials. PATIENTS: A total of 154 zanamivir and 167 placebo high-risk patients were included in the analysis.
main outcome measuresCost per day of normal activities; cost per symptom-free day; cost per complication averted; cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY).
resultsThe mean benefit was estimated to be 2.5 days [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.68 to 4.27] of normal activities gained; 2.0 (95% CI: 0.56 to 3.51) symptom-free days; and a 9% reduction in complications (95% CI: 0 to 18%). Excluding the effect of rare hospitalisation costs, the cost (1999 values) of gaining a day of normal activities was 9.50 Pounds (95% CI: 5 Pounds to 39 Pounds); cost per symptom-free day was 11.56 Pounds (95% CI: 6 Pounds to 43 Pounds); cost per complication averted was 262 Pounds (95% CI: 90 Pounds to 1574 Pounds). Influenza was estimated to reduce utility by 0.883 per day, demonstrating the debilitating effect of the disease. Extrapolating a day of normal activities to a standard utility measure resulted in a cost per QALY of 3900 Pounds excluding inpatient costs (7490 Pounds including inpatient costs). Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves demonstrated 90% certainty that zanamivir would be cost effective at 8000 Pounds per QALY.
conclusionsSignificant health benefits can be obtained with zanamivir treatment in high-risk patients. The cost per QALY for zanamivir in these patients compares well with that of other commonly used pharmacological interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.