Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11302979›Full record

ReviewGut2001

The promise and potential hazards of adenovirus gene therapy.

L S Young, V Mautner

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gut, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Viral Vector-Based Gene Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Regenerative medicine and cell-based approaches to restore pancreatic function.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2017
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Adenoviral vectors for gene therapy.Molecular biotechnology · 2007
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Gene therapy in the treatment of intestinal inflammation.International journal of colorectal disease · 2004
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

L S YoungCRC Institute for Cancer Studies University of Birmingham Birmingham B15 2TA, UK.
V Mautner

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

AdenoviridaeAnimalsGenetic TherapyGenetic VectorsHumansLiver DiseasesNeutrophil InfiltrationReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID11302979
PMCPMC1728283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.