Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11302795›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2001

Interactions of posaconazole and flucytosine against Cryptococcus neoformans.

F Barchiesi, A M Schimizzi, L K Najvar, R Bocanegra, F Caselli, S Di Cesare, D Giannini, L F Di Francesco, A Giacometti, F Carle and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Posaconazole: An Update of Its Clinical Use.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2015
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Combination treatment of invasive fungal infections.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2005
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Combination antifungal therapy.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2004
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

F BarchiesiIstituto di Malattie Infettive e Medicina Pubblica, Biostatistica e Informatica Medica, Università degli Studi di Ancona, Ancona, Italy. cmalinf@popsci.unian.it
A M Schimizzi
L K Najvar
R Bocanegra
F Caselli
S Di Cesare
D Giannini
L F Di Francesco
A Giacometti
F Carle
G Scalise
J R Graybill
The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · USMurphy Oil Corporation (United States) · USOspedali Riuniti di Ancona · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A checkerboard methodology, based on standardized methods proposed by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards for broth microdilution antifungal susceptibility testing, was applied to study the in vitro interactions of flucytosine (FC) and posaconazole (SCH 56592) (FC-SCH) against 15 isolates of Cryptococcus neoformans. Synergy, defined as a fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) index of <0.50, was observed for 33% of the isolates tested. When synergy was not achieved, there was still a decrease in the MIC of one or both drugs when they were used in combination. Antagonism, defined as a FIC of >4.0, was not observed. The in vitro efficacy of combined therapy was confirmed by quantitative determination of the CFU of C. neoformans 486, an isolate against which the FC-SCH association yielded a synergistic interaction. To investigate the potential beneficial effects of this combination therapy in vivo, we established two experimental murine models of cryptococcosis by intracranial or intravenous injection of cells of C. neoformans 486. At 1 day postinfection, the mice were randomized into different treatment groups. One group each received each drug alone, and one group received the drugs in combination. While combination therapy was not found to be significantly more effective than each single drug in terms of survival, tissue burden experiments confirmed the potentiation of antifungal activity with the combination. Our study demonstrates that SCH and FC combined are significantly more active than either drug alone against C. neoformans in vitro as well in vivo. These findings suggest that this therapeutic approach could be useful in the treatment of cryptococcal infections.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntifungal AgentsColony Count, MicrobialCryptococcosisCryptococcus neoformansDisease Models, AnimalDrug InteractionsDrug Therapy, CombinationFlucytosineMaleMeningitis, CryptococcalMiceMice, Inbred ICRMicrobial Sensitivity TestsTriazolesAntifungal AgentsFlucytosineposaconazoleTriazoles

Identifiers

PMID11302795
PMCPMC90473
OpenAlexW2118657446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.