Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11296129›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology reports2001

Therapy for fungal infections in leukemia.

R E Segal, G Y Minamoto

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology reports, 2001. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

R E SegalDivision of Infectious Diseases, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, NY 10461, USA.
G Y Minamoto
Montefiore Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Invasive fungal infections remain a common cause of morbidity and mortality among patients with leukemia who become further compromised by neutropenia. Candida and Aspergillus spp account for the vast majority of these infections, but other, less commonly recognized fungi can cause life-threatening infection in these hosts as well. The earlier, more limited antifungal armamentarium of ketoconazole, flucytosine, and amphotericin B has been substantially augmented by the availability of fluconazole, itraconazole, and the lipid-associated amphotericin formulations. Intense clinical study has focused on the use of these agents in empiric treatment, treatment of suspected or proven infection, and prophylaxis. Recognition of the limitations of antifungal therapy in the neutropenic host has led to evaluation of the adjunctive role of immunotherapy.

Indexed as

Amphotericin BAspergillosisAzolesCandidiasisFluconazoleHumansImmunotherapyLeukemiaMycosesNeutropeniaAmphotericin BAzolesFluconazole

Identifiers

PMID11296129
OpenAlexW2056597502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.