Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11293801›Full record

ArticleGenetica2000

Chromosomally-induced meiotic drive in Drosophila males: checkpoint or fallout?

J E Tomkiel

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Genetica, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

J E TomkielCenter for Molecular Medicine and Genetics, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48202, USA. jtomkiel@cmb.biosci.wayne.edu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In male Drosophila melanogaster, anomalies in sex chromosome pairing at meiosis often lead to complete or partial sperm dysfunction. This observation has led to the suggestion that defects in either the efficiency or configuration of chromosome pairing at metaphase trigger a checkpoint mechanism that leads to the elimination of meiotic products. Here, we discuss this model in consideration of recent observations on the conservation of metaphase checkpoint components in male meiosis, and on the phenotype of new alleles of the male-specific meiotic mutant teflon. Based on these observations, we propose an alternative hypothesis for the cause of sperm dysfunction in cases of chromosomal sterility and drive. We suggest that disruption of the prophase compartmentalization of sex chromatin, rather than abnormal pairing at metaphase, may be the causative defect. Such disruption may occur as a result of perturbations in sex chromosome pairing, or by translocations involving autosomal and sex chromatin. We discuss how this hypothesis may account for previously described examples chromosomal causes of meiotic drive and sterility in Drosophila.

Indexed as

AnimalsDrosophila melanogasterMaleMeiosisX ChromosomeY Chromosome

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.